-
Posts
1,649 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Blog Comments posted by EMMachine
-
-
On 6/18/2019 at 3:25 PM, XReN said:
"After they can not begin or finish their movement in 3 ", they will need at least a 7" movement to move across a unit."
It's actually 8" minimum since the unit also needs to get all of it's base across the board on the opposite edge of denied area
I made an update now for the point with the flying unit.
-
18 hours ago, XReN said:
"After they can not begin or finish their movement in 3 ", they will need at least a 7" movement to move across a unit."
It's actually 8" minimum since the unit also needs to get all of it's base across the board on the opposite edge of denied area
Yeah, I think I had that example from the old blog (at best defining the basesize).
It's basicly only the room the model covers (and in case of non flying units it works because the non flying unit has to move around the model).
It in case of flying units we basicly would have at least <basesize_defender>" + (3" * 2) + <basesize_flyer>" Movement to move over the unit (if it is a single model or a single line of models).
I will look how I will get that point right.
-
10 hours ago, Kramer said:
Great stuff. I would add one more (especially with all the recent attack first last abilities and 6” pile ins) To determine the attack order. If it’s your turn, have a think about what unit you’ll select first and what your opponent will likely do.
Do you have to attack with another first but will you opponent then get the chance to maul your combat unit. Get them out of there especially if you have the chance on the double.
I will look that I can add some things. (at the moment the old blog entry from @Matthijs is still quite present in this blog). I think one of the next blog entries will either be charge or pile in, so there is still room for first Attack, longer pile in etc.)
- 1
-
Looking at the Point of Fieldcontrol there weren't many changes in 2.0
Mostly the change of losing models in the endphase when the unit isn't in formation anymore or that buffs are often "wholly within" in new releases.
And I know, I have german text in some of the pictures.
-
When looking at the actual points compared to the old points, the list could actually get another unit of Dragon Blades or an Archmage because even the battalions are now a little more expensive there are about 160 Points more to spend now because Dragonlord and Dragonblades got cheaper.
-
Hm, didn’t realized until now that I had a typo in the titel.
Now I corrected it.
-
9 hours ago, jaxom said:
@EMMachine I thought about that, but after reviewing the updated base size charts I decided not to. It's more of a personal quirk - I don't like altering base sizes if I don't have to because I don't like spending on bases. Those Prosecutors are gorgeous! Does a 6 man unit with paired hammers and the 2 grandhammers work well for you?
It's more a project thing in my case. Beside this unit I have one 6 man unit with Hammer + Shield and 2 Grandblades, and a 6 man unit with Javelins and Tridents.
I actually never had them on the field.
8 hours ago, Black Blade said:@EMMachinehey we both paint Celestial Vindicators! can I get your steps for painting the turquoise armor?
Sure. In my case it's not the standardversion. I used
- Thousand Sons Blue
- Nuln Oil / Drakenhof Nightshade / Coelia Greenshade
- Thousand Sons Blue (retouch)
- Ahriman Blue
- Baharroth Blue
In case of Shade, there was a little evolution. At the beginning, I had used Nuln Oil, I think the Prosecutors were the first Models I used Drakenhof Nightshade and actually I use Coealia Greenshade (mostly because it is closer to the Colors I use than the other 2, and it's less retouching).
(I should actually make a post with the Paintlist in the project)
-
I actually glued my Prosecutors on 50mm Bases after realizing quickly that 40mm is too small for them.
These aren't GW bases. I had glued them on 40mm first. those bases have a 40mm notch, so I only had to cut-off the edge of the 40mm base and glued it into the notch.
-
There is some really nice (and partly really expensive) stuff here.
Hm, why do I have the feeling, that I have seen lions in such colors before ?
- 1
-
Fixed the Link of the Wildriders. For some reason the picture was only visible when I had logged in into Google ?.
-
Fixed the Links. For some reason the pictures were only visible when I was logged in with my Google account ?.
-
Hm, I think there are two problems.
1.) there is no mentioning in the new rules that you can take a spectific Allegiance and Grand Alliance Allegiance Abilities. So there is the question if it is possible in this Edition taking the Cityrules in a Army with Specific Allegiance.
2. you have 5 Allied Units in your Army. The rule that you only can take 1 Ally per 4 units is not overriden by Matched Play (the 400 Points maximum for 2000 Points is in addition to the corerule Restriction), so you would need 15 Order Serpentis Units and I only see 8
- 1
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Naming reference of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle" in the story.
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
I have to look how to make it. At the moment I'm not using the layout, so is's mostly black & white wordstyle. There is nothing to download. It's a link to my google drive.
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
Do to the Entry The naming Problem I have changed the Name of the "Order of the Yellow Rose" to "Order of the Verdant Cycle".
-
First I thought Order of the golden rose could be a good Idea, but than I found multiple posts on Twitter with exacly that wording.
After I didn't found anything to "Order of the Verdant Cycle" I think I choose this. I made two collector tweets on Twitter that could be found with #OrderOfTheVerdantCycle
Now I have to change the references in my stories. The advantage is that I'm now free, what I want to use for my banners, too.
-
6 hours ago, Remus Prime said:
I really like your tribesmen, what bits did you use for them?
Hi,
For the Tribesmen I used the bodies of Kairic Acolytes
The Heads of Marauder Horsemen
Spears and Shields of Eternal Guard (more than one Box is needed because not all spears are usable).
- 1
-
21 minutes ago, Melcavuk said:
Scions of the Everqueen
Order of the Eternal Goddess
...
Interestingly something like "Order of the Everqueen" I thought after @Gecktron last post. Would perhaps sound better than "Order of Alarielle".
In case of Scions, I think that would be more related to Sylvaneth than Aelfs and Humans.
Sterntower Marksmen
in Defenders of Black Fire Pass
A blog by Slackest_Dorf in General
Posted
Play these guys with the Open War Army Generator the the Negativ having a 6+ save is turning into a possitive because they count towards the horde category instead of regular.