christophe
-
Posts
241 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Store
Downloads
Blogs
Events
Posts posted by christophe
-
-
On 4/15/2020 at 5:24 PM, novakai said:
Gargants larger then the current ones and closer to Behemat size
woot bring out the proper bigger Gargants
I hope we will get new battleline giants, would be happy to make an army without the old gargants models...
-
Any idea for a army terrain ? A stone table (dolmen style) with some food (Johan, a cow...) on top could be fun.
-
9 minutes ago, KingBrodd said:
Me either. I think itll be a single Gargant with some Human allies. First Destructive Mortal Tribesman?
Allies ? I hope not, a giant should be in a other category than a troll or an ogre...
I was expecting some bulkier giants, but it make sense they kept the previous design. And it indeed has a very welcome non grimdark fairy tale touch.
Would you put your money on 3 kits or 1 multi build for the 3 giants in the pictures ?
-
On 1/23/2020 at 11:43 AM, Pitloze said:
If they have shields then we can expect a 3+ save Gargant maybe. Oof.
The big dwarf ships were not so good in the armor departement. Realism is often secondary in AoS. To have more pleasant match up vs army with few MW maybe they will give them tons of wound and more average save ? (Except ofc for the faction Petrifex Gargants ;p)
-
-
18 hours ago, sandlemad said:
I dunno, blackpowder weapon zombies with a glint of personality, ghost ships, mutants with swords for legs, monstrous undead crabs, actual mecha made from shipwrecks and drowned men are all pretty fantastical. They'd stand out nicely from the other Death factions and would be a good way to reintroduce rotting flesh to Death's aesthetic, but in a unique enough way (maritime, combined with blackpowder, seawater and rotting wood) that it wouldn't step on Nurgle's toes/conceptual space.
I feel Deepkin should have been that... or full see creatures army : shark or crab face guys on giant krakens...
- 1
-
On 12/5/2019 at 8:02 AM, Bryan I Guess said:
Raptoryx wings actually.
I was thinking to replace some heads with corvus cabal bird skulls on my Bonereapers.
-
3 hours ago, Sleboda said:
Actually, the old lore:
Nurgle - Accepting the inevitable. The unending cycle. Inviolable. Absolute.
Vs
Tzeentch - Master your own fate. Nothing is set in stone. Everything changes all the time.
Khorne - All that matters is battle. Strength. Pride. Martial skill. Focus all on killing. The only worthwhile sensation is the thrill of the kill.
Vs
Slaanesh - Whee! Experience everything. All sensation is great. Kill or be lazy. It's all the same. Fighting is just one of a million cool things to do.
Nurgle should go under Order, same for Nagash While Khorne is clearly destruction 😜
-
8 hours ago, Kramer said:
Armoured giants if I had my way. Shiny golden armour. In between the keeper of secrets and ogors in build and height. Kratos style weapons on chains. Probably a bit late for the designers to take my suggestions into account 😂
I would prefer mine taller than trolls, 15 cm +
- 1
-
I feel it's maybe too detailed and well done to be terrain and even more a endless spell...
-
3 or 4 big armored giants with ranged weapons allied with 2 dozen some small animal-like minions could work (aether wing...).
-
I feel GW could do giant monsters, maybe even with scales, but would make it look like nothing others company produce, traditional dragon include...
- 1
-
31 minutes ago, Gwendar said:
I like it, great job. I'm still struggling to find a scheme. I know I'm doing jade weapons\shields with copper or gold as the metallics throughout, but thinking of a complementary color to use for the bone is what's getting to me as I don't want to use a standard bone color. Maybe I'll go with gray...or a mars red.
Black would work nicely with your scheme, with reddish leather. Salamanders Chapter style.
- 1
-
-
-
7 hours ago, firtahl said:
From a numbers perspective, spears are better than swords when fighting in 3 rows. In 10 man squads, you'll rarely if ever be fighting 3 deep, so when taking MSU, swords are optimal. However, if the only rule you care about is the rule of cool then follow your heart on which weapon to model. I for one think spears look way the best.
I love the spears look on the guards but find them akward on the riders. No dynamism.
-
11 hours ago, alghero81 said:
I’m not that harsh with him but I’m on the same line. I have more than 10k points of Death armies, more than half painted, but no Nagash. After reading his story in WFB (nice books by the way) I really disliked him but one day I’ll buy that model.
And maybe paint it.
I am sure a new one will come at some point.
-
I will try to fit deathriders mounts skulls on my immortis guards for an egyptian god-beast look
- 1
-
I will go for a super fluffy uneffective Pratorian list, with big daddy, 2 crawlers, 40 spear guards, some cavalry and sarchophagius guy (in one or 2 years when he got a proper release but I hate his head, so I will switch it, probably for a Corvus Cabal raven skulls !!
-
To Those who bought it : are you happy with your OBR dices ?
-
-
Arff, really wanted to like the boneshaper, but I hate his feet position
-
No archer as a 3rd battline is such a missed opportunity...
-
1 hour ago, KK9T said:
I’m really loving the idea of an all cavalry army.
Me too, but 2 real types of cavalry would help for that...
The Rumour Thread
in Age of Sigmar Discussions
Posted
Gorkamorka Fantasy Battle !!