Jump to content

Ratboy genius

Members
  • Posts

    254
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ratboy genius

  1. Insert gloomspite gits/nighthaunt battletome commentary here
  2. thats not true, nids have less non plastic models
  3. The incarnate looks like a scrapped skaven model to me tbh
  4. I can't imagine even gw would shoot out only an eshin hero with gutter runners (metal in 3s for a 5 man unit LOLE) and nightrunners being in their current state. They did make that warcry box though
  5. 5 sentinels have 250% of the range that these guys do lmao
  6. it could be a blood bowl model still, certain teams are much less armored than others (Amazon/Norse)
  7. thats just because the skaven and sylvaneth releases are just that massive right
  8. It was expected if you start off with the premise of gw can't help themselves but try and force dok into popularity
  9. It's got big teeth and looks like a rat tail on the left side I guess. Skaven have normal growth periods as far as we know, although I'm not sure if broodmothers are still around in aos
  10. speak for yourself my dad works at nintendo workshop
  11. skaven ain't got a stellar record for returning to the store after being removed
  12. more than likely means out of stock, it's a known bug on their data side. small indie company btw
  13. thats where ur wrong, gw will always find a way
  14. no its the new campaign book in july, august is the lumineth book to fit the new units
  15. I wonder if there was a pic that would make it clear if the aos reveals would only be for the main game or not
  16. I can absolutely say that the original craftworld eldar aesthetic is extremely solid and I'm glad they kept it. What else would there be to say about it? I can't compare it to an old version and say one is better than the other because they kept the same aesthetic and just improved the execution. I hope they do more of that. Iconic designs shouldn't be left to rot so that they can come up with bigger and wackier hats that half the playerbase thinks is awful. "Which pretty much brings us back to AOS, where designers are choosing to not take a chance and just give us underwhelming foot heroes since Kruleboyz and the dragons have released." Having a glut of underwhelming foot heroes has nothing to do with sticking to existing aesthetics and everything to do with gw not doing anything more exciting than a token foot hero. There are dozens of existing model designs which would be extremely exciting to see an update for, and no new aesthetic shifts are required to do so either.
  17. You don't need to change things for the sake of changing things. Look at necron flayed ones- the old metal ones were considered superior aesthetically to the resin ones for example. Just because you can change an aesthetic doesn't make it a good change. It doesn't matter if stoneguard are amazing models or not- you are obviously on one side of the fence- but the point was that not everyone has the same opinion on what a good update is, and such alarith stoneguard are not good or bad as much as the new craftworld are good or bad. I mean other than them being elves, which are always bad of course
  18. You ask the 40k crowd they'd probably say the same thing in reverse- "aren't you glad our Good Elf update is refreshingly lacking in dumb giant hats and hammers etc" Some aesthetic designs are just good, like skaven, and don't need to be radically changed. No need to add longhorns where none are needed
  19. I mean there's not too much more they could do to nerf skaven at this point, already just sitting above meme factions on the tier list
×
×
  • Create New...