Jump to content

Craptrain

Members
  • Posts

    70
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Craptrain

  1. The warscroll says “reroll saves for attacks that target that unit”. The word “failed” is not present.
  2. My happiness is not 40k-based. It's Warhammer-based (both 40k and AoS). Heck, I have fully built and painted every unit in the Nighthaunt battletome just this summer (Kurdoss Valentian and Bladegheists still in progress). I think you misinterpreted my point.
  3. People, some perspective here please. We literally just finished the wave of releases for SCE and Nighthaunt. So yeah, there were no huge reveals at Warhammer Fest, but that doesn't mean there won't be any at Nova or that there's nothing on the horizon for AoS. As someone who plays both 40k and AoS, I have been beyond happy with how the past year of releases has gone. Exercise a little patience and realize that GW has multiple systems and armies to support other than your specific one or two.
  4. Agreed wholeheartedly. My only point was in a one-to-one comparison (mostly because I'm starting a Tamurkhan army and the guy I play against most often runs The Glottkin pretty frequently).
  5. Just another addition I've noticed in putting together my current project. Comparing The Glottkin to Tamurkhan, Tamurkhan is 20 points more but The Glottkin is simply a better unit. Glottkin has a better command ability, higher damage potential, and is a wizard. I would like to see Tamurkhan's point cost reduced to about 20 points less than The Glottkin in order to better reflect his value.
  6. As someone who only got into playing Warhammer with the release of Age of Sigmar, I currently have: Mixed Death: 2800 pts Flesh Eater Courts: 2500 pts Sylvaneth: 2500 pts
  7. Truly impressive work. I actually really like the colors on your WIP giant. The pale palette with the crimson thrown in makes it look like some kind of deep cave dwelling creature that doesn't get any sunlight. I'd love to see the finished pictures.
  8. If they were 2 wounds apiece I feel like they might be under-costed at 100 points. 120 might be more appropriate at that point I would think.
  9. I would agree with all four of these points, but would reduce Tree Revenants down to 80 points for 5. I think 90 is still a little too steep for what they realistically do on the battlefield (in a vacuum they can't even reliably beat a unit of skeleton warriors). I am aware that built in to their cost is their waypipe ability and a small consideration for wyldwoods, but 100 or even 90 still feels steep to me.
  10. Location: San Antonio, TX 78248 Name: Ryan N Contact: Forum PM
×
×
  • Create New...