Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...

Aryann

Members
  • Content Count

    368
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

363 Celestant-Prime

About Aryann

  • Rank
    Dracothian Guard

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    GAMA was a bit of a let down for AoS. Even though 40k is on a roll I expect 1-2 new battletomes to be announced and maybe some more light on Forbidden Power. So far it were the first halfs of the year for AoS to get its announcements so Adepticon and later Warhammer Fest are our best bets for AoS news.
  2. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    I won't continue the subject but with all the respect - you literally deleted ONE SIDE of the discussion, leaving the other intact. There are still posts encouraging multi-culti/ racial diversity/ social justice in Age of Sigmar. If you deleted my voice of objection, so should be done with posts of @JPjr and @Nos who want their beliefs to be represented in our hobby. Just to be treated equally. I won't come to the matter again. Sorry for the offtopic but I didn't start it. Cheers.
  3. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    Rules aren't the only issue. I, and I'm sure many others, choose armies based not on their rules but on their looks and design. Even though Kharadrons suck I bought them because I love their design. Even if (or maybe especially if) faction X was winning all tournaments but it didn't meet my design expectation I wouldn't spend a single penny on it. Giving Fyreslayers new battletome doesn't change a thing for me to consider buying into this army because as is it is boring in model range. Give them lava golems, fyre-elementals or dwarf-golem hybrids and I'm interested even without new battletome.
  4. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    Honestly, if Fyreslayers and Ironjawz get the same treatment as let's say FEC with just Spells, scenery and a book it's fail of the year for GW. They both need at least few models, a release compared to opening a new stormcast chamber.
  5. Aryann

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    What are all options to generate bloodtithe points?
  6. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    Might be wrong but I interpret most changes as ok. At least for my build. Will see myself.
  7. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    So Games Workshop actually fixes Khorne by warscrolle changes. Great changes. I really like what they did with Blodsecrator and Wrathmongers. Getting the book defenitely. Now it's time for Kharadron Overlords to have their warscrolls rewritten. 😀
  8. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    I'm ok with Khorne Endless Spells. I treat them like a divine intervention made by a furious god full of hatred.
  9. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    I don't understand why only Demons receive Locus of Fury. At which part are they inferior to mortals?
  10. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    Do I understand correctly that people from GW write on instagram that they are aware that Tzeentch and Kharadrons need a new battletome? By the way what's wrong with Tzeentch?
  11. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    What's IG?
  12. Aryann

    The Rumour Thread

    With battletomes updates I have a question to people who own/compared 1st edition battletome to 2nd/3rd. So far we had two editions of FEC and Khorne and three (or four?) of Stormcast Eternals. I want to ask, how different are battletomes from each edition? Is there new lore? Artworks? I want to know because I'm not sure if it's worth buying new Sylvaneth book (in my case) if the only differences will be like 3-5 pages with allegiance and spells. For warscrolls I use exclusively tha AoS app which is more handy than the book.
  13. Sylvaneth rarely gets into top 10 at tournaments. They have their strengths and weaknesses. Overall, well balanced. 390 points (Gnarlwood + household + 2x Tree-Revenants) is a lot. It's almost Durthu or 2x Kurnoth Hunters. That's why this battalion’s effect is good. Before making small tweaks to armies like Sylvaneth I expect GW to fix some obvious mistake in balance like overpowered DoK with ridiculously powerful allegiance abilities and cheap heroes and to fix armies that long seem to be unplayable both by communities voice and tournaments' results (Ironjawz, Kharadron Overlords, StD) Edit: Shouldn't this thread be moved to Sylvaneth Discussion in the Order forum?
  14. And extremely costy. Not only cost heavy but also popular Gnarlwood forces you to take very fragile (and useless against many armies) 2 units of Tree-Revenants. That's 230+2x80 points if I remember correctly. A lot. Really lot.
  15. Complaining about number of the woods or the space they take is like complaining that goblins or skeletons come in large numbers. Or that they cause mortal wounds. Seriously? I complain that Tzeentch and Skyre do a lot of mortal wounds and they even do that from a distance! Should we change that? No, that's the theme of those armies. Seriously the game has more requiring attention problems than changing Sylvaneth playstyle. Play with more terrain and less SW you will see. I like the idea of AOE single woods because to be honest it is hard to transport all the woods each time. Just don't nerf that mechanic. It will turn Sylvaneth useless. It's their own, cool theme, well balanced as it is. Edit: also, letting your Sylvaneth opponent to drop many woods is a fault in your strategy. Due to how big the woods are and how restrictive it is to place them it's easy to block them by just relocating your troops or playing them more sparse. It's something you need to keep in mind, just as if you need to remember about all Nighthaunt to have flying and ethereal or Idoneth to strike first on the 3rd round. Just part of strategy.
×