Jump to content

Aeryenn

Members
  • Posts

    1,162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

Everything posted by Aeryenn

  1. So let's hope GW will return to lending their IPs. I think we all agree that there were some great Warhammer board and card games in the past.
  2. Couldn't they just outsource printing cardboards? They already do for current games like Kill Team or Cursed City. It's not a matter of a forced choice: plastic or cardboards. They could do both. There are many board game companies that produce board games that consist of cardboard, cards and plastic miniatures.
  3. Valid point to be honest. Yet only it would take to be successful at this new field is to hire people already working in the industry. I'm sure people designing board games for a living come and go from one company to another. GW has all the resources necessary to fund such a team of people.
  4. My Warhammer entry point wasn't Age of Sigmar. It also wasn't 40k. I have started my journey with ffg's Warhammer Invasion - a living card game that each month received a new pack of cards. It introduced 6 playable factions, it was fast and easy to play. Without a doubt I spent hundreds of hours playing it with friends, almost every evening after college. Than there were titles like Chaos in the Old World, Forbidden Stars, Relic, Conquest... I really miss them. Now you might say that GW does release board games like Blackstone, Cursed City or Silver Tower. Yes it does, but these kind of games require a lot more of dedication due to the need of assembling and painting minis. What's more it seems to me that it requires less development and resources to create mentioned board games or card games. These games were insanely popular in my country when they were published. Even now if one would want to buy a second hand copy of Forbidden Stars or Chaos in the Old World it takes at least 3x the initial price compared to when it was firstly published. Board games might also explore genres different to what GW released so far. Think of an economic game of Kharadron trade routes. Or a Netrunner style card game set in 40k. So what do you think? Will GW eventually move into those areas? What about Talisman?
  5. There are factions and we all can name them that DESPERATELY need more than 1 foot hero + book. And we have silly examples like Fyreslayers who have more than double the number of heroes compared to infrantry. I wish GW prioritized some of these armies with low unit count and treated them with at least 2-3 units +1 hero, like they did with Sylvaneth.
  6. Vashtorr - strong competitor for mini of the year.
  7. I just have to say this: what a disappointment. I'd say like 95% of Gitz players wanted new Spider Riders with a Boss on a Spider and GW publishes generic goblins on wolves that fit LotR rather than AoS... These are literally the last post End Times models I'd be willing to paint.
  8. I'd like some zombie heroes and monsters for a second wave of Soulblight.
  9. These are one of the best models GW created this year. On par with Gossamid Archers and Revenant Seekers imho. They REALLY need to refresh the grave guard for AoS in this matter. Just give 10-20 possible builds of the guys above.
  10. That's unexpected. I thought King Brodd was already a lot but nice that they still can surprise us.
  11. Tzeentch dice... Comparte the new ones to the old. Their latest dice are so lazy and boring. Thankfully I have a box of the old ones.
  12. I'd rather wait another three years or so for a whole new range of Dark Elves than accepting a treatment similar to Skaven or Seraphon. And believe me I want Dark Elves almost as bad as KingBrodd wanted Gargants. It's just, although Dark Elves' minis are great in terms of design, they really show their age. I really hope Dark Elves will be AoSified and refreshed as Lumineth or Sylvaneth were.
  13. I'd say they have enough ships BUT they could get a Mech Vehicle instead. This could open a whole new direction for this faction. Even better if they get a Slaanesh treatment. Khorne needs a big MORTAL centerpiece so that they could play on their own without demons.
  14. So due to the success of KingBrodd should I change my nickname to "Malerion" to put some pressure on GW to release Dark Elves? Do you think it might work?
  15. King Brodd's model is really solid. Seems he had the same legs as the rest of Gargants. Will they replace the current box with a new one with additional parts for Brodd? Slaves to Darkness although had a leak a few months back I still think have won the show. Underworlds team is ok but I think Khorne has already had enough. I still dislike Votan and think they're the worst dwarfs from GW. I wonder what they are going to do with dual box or if there even will be one. 3 man-eaters and a few ogors? Sounds poor. I think nobody is expecting a mega-gargant in the box. Or maybe there isn't going to be a dual box this time?
  16. If one model is everything they consider an update... it's not much in case of ogors. I would remake all of their infantry.
  17. Hope for rumoured spiderfang with new riders.
  18. Since I am pointy ears lover as well maybe I'm stabbing myself in the back but I actually think GW did a fantastic job with combining trees and wood elves into Sylvaneth, especial with the last release of Spiteriders and Gossamid Archers. I can't think of Wood Elves to fill this same spot but somehow being more wood elfy. Both of these units scream to me "hey, we are wood elves but better". Hope you don't mind posting pictures of my own minutes mentioned. I really enjoy the design of these models.
  19. *angry mumbling* .... Dark Elves ... it's their turn now... waited far too long... *angry mumbling*
  20. Was there any clarification whether Spiderfang receives only a new hero, new spider riders or both?
  21. I think Malerion Dark Elves will have their own unique design but who knows...
×
×
  • Create New...