Jump to content

Sorrow

Members
  • Posts

    288
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Sorrow

  1. Honestly, I would like to see Kurnothi released as a proper army, not just Underworlds or even Warcry warbands.
  2. @LeonBox Absolutely amazing, you have a very rich imagination! GW should let you write our battletome. Could I ask you for a favor, could you apply your rich imagination and expand upon the Lurid Haze faction, if you could come up with six artefacts of power, six command traits and battle traits that are lore fitting for the Lurid Haze faction? I would be eternally grateful to you if you could do this, since I am planning on making a purely Lurid Haze themed Hedonites (there will be heavy customization of miniatures, I already got various censers from Skaven) army and I am dying for lore inspiration! My thanks in advance!
  3. I can only say thank you to both @LeonBox and @CeleFAZE for their work. Our battletome really does come off as lore shallow overall.
  4. I agree. Honestly, just a point decrease for a few units and Slaangor rewrite. That is all we need. Let us pray to Slaanesh that GW takes a look at our survey data.
  5. We did our part, the rest is up to GW. Tournament data from the world places us at Beasts of Chaos level in competitive scene. For a newly updated army, that is quite bad. People look at armies that got updated such as Lumineth or released such as Soulblight and the difference is truly great. Just take a look where Lumineth and Soulblight end up on tournament data.
  6. @Enoby@AngryPanda My friend has picked up our survey, it has been sent to proper GW departments.
  7. @Enoby you gem! I have sent the document to GW. When my friend picks it up, I will let you all know. Anyway, the results are interesting, Glutos being "No I think they are too highly costed: 145 (51.8%)"
  8. @Enoby you gem! I have sent the document to GW. When my friend picks it up, I will let you all know.
  9. Take a look at this Metawatch stat. Overall, it does seem that for a newly updated faction, Hedonites are struggling, at least competitively. My own personal experience in casual games has been pretty good, although I would like to field more Painbringers, Slickblades and especially Slaangors.
  10. I think it would be wise for the survey to be up for two weeks. The larger the statistical sample, larger is the GW interest to actually take a look and read it.
  11. I apologize for short post but I am at work so; In general I have found the following to be a problematic part of our faction: Slaangors, Painbringers, Slickblades, Shalaxi and regular Keeper of Secrets. In my opinion, Slaangors need a warscroll rewrite, while the others just need to a cost readjustment. I do not own a Be'lakor, though it is evident I must buy him asap.
  12. Honestly, anyone who chooses the option that they are too cheaply costed is just trolling us. Slaangors are such a beautiful models with cool lore, I wish to field them as much as possible.
  13. @Enoby you are a gem of this forum, as I said before!
  14. In my games thus far, Glutos and Sigvald rarely, if ever, disappoint. I think they are absolutely not the problematic part of our faction.
  15. I think it would be wise of us to continue with the survey path. GW does listen to proper feedback and the individual I plan to send final version of survey, has told me half a hour ago, that he will send it to proper GW departments. The survey will not get lost but will reach destinations, beyond that, it is up to people working in those departments.
  16. Sorry to see you leave. Looking back, a lot of fellow Slaanesh players who posted here a year ago, are no longer posting.
  17. More data is needed, indeed, but there are reasons why competitive players are rather choosing to play Soulblight, which were released after Hedonites. And @Cambyses is right.
  18. Honestly, if only GW could drop the cost of Slickblades and Painbringers and rewrite Slaangors, I would call our faction perfect.
  19. I am always willing to help with the survey and its distribution to as many people who play Slaanesh as possible. But AOS 3. will heavily feature updates for factions that are outdated, whether in rules or models, such as BoC, Skaven, Idoneth. We can do a survey and since I am on first name basis with a individual who works in their UK customer service, the survey will 100% be sent to proper departments. Beyond that, it is up to people working in those departments. @Enoby I was thinking of making a thread, where we could write what potential models we would like to see as part of Hedonites one day. Completely new models, reflecting various concepts linked to Slaanesh. Do you think there would be interest?
  20. @Enoby Our time in the sun has passed. Other factions need attention. Quite a lot of them. I think that our rules and cost will remain as they are for years.
  21. I think that Kruleboyz in their overall aesthetics fit very, very well with their lore and lands they lord over. They embody the "Beasts", the "Swamps" and the "Cunning" into one very interesting faction.
  22. That would be a very good Shalaxi, quite lore correct too. Also, for my fellow Hedonites, @AngryPanda Thoughts?
  23. Kharadon Overlords placing mildly surprises me. Pretty amusing to see the Soulblight and the Lumineth at the top and the Hedonites at the bottom.
×
×
  • Create New...