Jump to content

deynon

Members
  • Posts

    832
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by deynon

  1. Do you remember that dopplenger cloak now in "a use only", so you can use it only once, right?
  2. you deserved it ahshah^^ anyway quite a lot depend on your opponent and the contest you're playing at
  3. I didn't like the LoN:B battalions since their releasing. I understand that they wanted to promote the Mortarchs, but 6 battalions and only one free of Named Characters... moreover DeathMarch has been crippled and messed by FAQs and Commentary. I like the general warscroll battalions mechanic and I like also the idea about a Bg behind it,but LoN:B ones are too few (the least amount known almost) and they are all quite points expensive either you consider the units points needed either you take not about their respective cost in buying the warscroll battalions.
  4. Sincerly I play both Black knights and Heixwraiths, I don't find them to be an altervative of each other. I use them to cover different roles. Balck Knights usualy are in units of 5 or 10 to be able to create a safe zone or a massime fast impact against the enemy. Take note that usually I play the legion of Night, so if I play them in defensive way I gain also the defensive deplyment zone bonus. They are nice at defending but also at attacking. I miss a rend -1 on their weapons, but with the right combination they can be quite massive in attacks they can inflict, moreover if they charge. The Heixwraith instead I use them usually in units of 5 to hunt the enemy. They're usually more resilient, and can damage bboth attacking and retreating. The ethereal rules let me block units with great rend but not many attacks (they even blocked the cafeteria of the Ex Empire). And Being them also a summanable unit I don't mind too much to make them eventually make a come back if destroyed. I find them perfect as a way to threat and stall the enemy. Ulucky I found units of 10 of them not so good. I prefer units of 5 talking about the Hexwraith cause I find them more maneageble for the usages I give them usually.
  5. If you need I realized also a playlist of video talking about the different parts of the Legion of Nagash if you need some detailed talking to integrate:
  6. When I opened my YouTube channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCe1qXHV7vp3lcxH3mM85bhw I started a project about a Bastilodon to magnetizing it, I created the first video: But for the second part I was always missing a step. The bases are in the first video, but I needed something paculiar. Recently so I've developed that "something" that was missing, so I finished magnetizing it, and =ve created "the crazy hand". I have to thank the blue stuff to be able to move forward cause helped me really a lot this time. I have in mind some other option and magnetizing cause the Bastilodon it's a wonderful base to work on, If you add that I have an Aztech rollerpin it helps really quite a lot to develop new options^^ I'll upload this topic in the future so. In the while you can "Total Recall" with this new hand^^
  7. Skipping it qould be idiocy by GW turning off the NH:B by the releasing of LoG. NH:B is too recent. LoG has no Access to warscroll battalions. And the ways to play LoG and NH;B are totally different. Based on rules, spells, options and so on it's a quite big different usage. what it would have been interesting it would be make LoG part of LoN:B. To have at least access to deathmarch, or more spells
  8. Not much as a fellow player or the answer would be more precise. Anyway we have to wait FAQs, but seeing deathmarch and black coach new model examples, a no it's foresighted
  9. They can be really themed units in the army. Undead mercenaries ah, I miss the skeleton one.
  10. units and warscroll battalions are " a bit" different ones. Moreover their answer is nosense. You play units...but battlaions have different keywords from the units that compose that warscroll battalions quite often. Or they want to say that the warscroll battlion inherit also teh keywords of the units it is composed by? Really silly answer If they FAQ it, it's only welcomed... if they don't mess everything like deathmarch...
  11. better archrent eventually. You would have been able to gain a wizard and a unit from the borders. The problem would have been the CP lost
  12. @sigwarus: could you play mercenaries in the tournament? I realized a review about the legion of grief if you are interested, so to share my thought about it
  13. I brought all the text referring the lines, what it misses is the part on the wounds recovering. No text avoided. If you say a miss somethng you should bring. I proved that there is the same txt, only a word difference and doesn't influence anything. And even there is the link to the graveyards themselves again. The text it's the same as in LoN:B so if you insist to apply limitations to LoG you have to apply also to LoN:B cause it's exacttly the same. Also in LoG they say they are abilities referred to the graveyards, otherways you can't even use them at ll cause you need the graveyards, and they listed even the referring to the graveyards , I wrote the sentence about. You continue to say that I miss part of the text, but the only one missing it it's you it seems. I wrote the rules and showed them iy's you to continue to argue about an idea without saying the rules about. The Sylvaneth have had liomits to their woods positioning. And anyway if they really want to do it, they are free to do it, they can't thenafter thinking of even miss a rule without being tortured so. It's not different from when someone said you could bring 4 Nagash and none could stop you with first AoS version, a totally irreal happening. And again it doesn't matter such thing with our discussion. I don't care what it reminds you. The rules say different from what you claim, and I showed it. You only bragged about and no rule to support your idea.
  14. I'm not ignoring it. the text for both the invigorating aura it's exactly the sam except the word I listed. And you are fogotting about the gravesites that they make you see the gravesites. Not mind if together or not. That is an ability of a gravesite. "if you do so, pick a gravesite (see "the unquiet dead") [...]" nowhere it says you can only chose 1 gravesite, but simply "a". IF you say that only one can do so it's also about the LoN:B cause it specify "this" so you can only choose a single specific one based on your idea. You don't have a single instance of ability , it's only once based on your idea, 4 graveyards, 4 applying. There is not "each" in LoN gravesites, so you can't say there to be the difference. I wrote the sentences related to and there is not "each" you are referring to. Otherways it should have wittten: choose a single graveyard to apply this rule. You can change the text, but you have to to to LoN:B too, otherays it's the same. the e-mail GW gaq answering mean nothing at all till it is published as a FAQ whatever it is. it can't be confyusing to allies.In the allies it's clearly written that they can't use the allegiance abilities. No confusion avalaible. It's not changed.it's the same. "This" and "a" are mutual. The problem would have been "any", that would have brought a single use.
  15. nope. if you see the text. "At the start of your hero phase, pick a friendly SUMMONABLE unit wthin 9" of this gravesite [...]" "At the start of your hero phase, pick a friendly SUMMONABLE unit within 9" of a gravesite [...]" Nowhere it0s written "each" as you suggest. and the difference "this" and "a" is not relevant, it doesn't changee the grammar. It would have been like you say only if it would have been written "any" and even your saying that they are urrelated to the graveyard it's wrong, cause they say you to see "unquite dead" about it. It's the same. If you declare only a gravesite works, such it's also for LoN:B and viceversa.
  16. But it doesn't change anything at all . It's exactly the same, thre are still 4 graveyards and you can use it from each of them. If you find problems in this you have to find problems also in LoN:B. Cause don't mind if they are under the same voice or out, they are still battle traits either position you consider. And they work the same way too. It's still an ability asosciated to a graveyard. Even before they where not a whole anyway cause the where different aspects, but the text or so on it's still the same.
  17. I confused the"invigorating aura" with the deathly invocation anyway it's a battle trait either in the LoN:B and in the Legion of Grief. Even the text is the exact same when talking about "invigoratin aura" unquiet dead and deathless minions. At least the difference between "this" and "a" about graveyards in the Invigorating aura doesn' change the result. The problem would have been it would have been written "any".
  18. Why only 1 invigorting aura per Hero phase? You can use one ofr each hero
  19. Ah, I've almost fogot... You can't use the artifacts from the various battletomes, only the ones about the Forbidden Power or thMalign Sorcery, nice, isn't it?^^
  20. What I find really bad about the Black coach is the FAQ about asking permission to your oppponent o play the new model one with LoN... a pity that the old one is not anymore avalaible anyway... About that FAQ is right .The problem is only now cause the Legion of Grief of Forbidden Power. Previouslyit wouldn'ì't even care. About General FAQ I've noticed they removed a previous FAQ GA warscrolls battalions avalaible to be used in any Allegiance that had it as GA. As it is now, you're right. Anyway you could not have had access to Legion of Grief with the Deathrattle warscroll battalion cause it allows only to units to take "legion of Grief", not warscroll battalions, so the problem would be anyway the same. It should have had the text as in LoN:B, but such it isn't.For the same reason you can't use the warscroll battalions coming from the NH:B. So at the end it's stil the same: no warscroll battalions with the Legion of Grief. And if you think about it it's quite a mocking for the Nighthaunts even more. Obviously they can correct it with FAQs, but really, would be admitting than even when writiting so few rules lines they don't give any care. They game the grvestites with the datacards and in the Forbidden power box you can find them too (shabby ones), otherways you have to create your own ones. The Forbidden Spells of Forbidden Power would have been amazing ones for LoN^^ The new factioon book has been announced for this year release. And it's not a republiscing of LoN:B so (y)our wish can be done^^
  21. the LoN:B GA:death has been outdated. There are a few diffwrences so it's usually ignored, but it's so by the rules. The disrinction to the FEC id voluntarilly done. Thd,Leguons gave a common keyword, yhe leguon given itself. The patched nighthaunt army is really a bad taste, moreover when you see the black coach With yhe forbidden power book in some way you can Deathmarch is done so in the way that tou can use it with GA:D, otherways it would become even more useless with the deathrattke keyword. Thd FAQs xompletely ruined it making it a waste and a mess You can use it in Soulblight army as deathmarch cause they are Death, see FAQs Anyway I totally agree in a reboot. There has been too many changes to the book itself. It has been done a poor work from the beginning with LoN. 6 warscroll vattalions but if you don't move a mortarch ypu have barely one avalaible (deathmarch) and even it crippled
  22. Also the normale Ghoul king can. It was so also without the FAQs anyway. Cause GKoTG/DZ are not Archregent with SummonRoyal guard. The FAQs put everythinh on betterscreen.
  23. My one can make you have some ideas on how to create your own scheme eventually: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gVut23k736Q
  24. I'm creating different video about hw to personalize your own army. One thing is about using icons and so on. The problem is that often we create once the icons and then we find trumbles to do it again, so we can use such methods to create are replicas. Remember that you should not use this to replicate complete copyrights models. Remember that you can chose freely wich material use to create your replica This is the first part about one side only. In the next future I'll bring also the one about the double side Bright side mode on: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wgskdTUkgU
  25. I'm not a great painter, but lately some people asked me how I realised my Nighthaunt's models painting, so I decided to create a sorrt of guide to specify it and talk about the various options that you can gain using really simple "tricks" about painting. Obviously is not something applying only to the nighthaunt. And the tricks can be used also for other clors eventually. Simply I mainly use it for my nighthaunt and geen about it^^ Here is the video:
×
×
  • Create New...