Jump to content

Celestantpants

Members
  • Posts

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Celestantpants's Achievements

Retributor

Retributor (4/10)

105

Reputation

  1. I'm very happy to be wrong about war scroll changes to dragons and points nerfs to fulminators and longstrikes. I said I'd happily admit I was wrong if those things didn't happen, so here it is: I was wrong, and I'm glad I was wrong. Good call to those of you who said it wouldn't happen. This update is honestly pretty great for Stormcast from a competitive stand point. Expect to see Stormcast keep doing well at tournies.
  2. Hey everyone, what is your favorite Stormhost? As far as fluff is concerned, I should add. My favorite is the Hammers of Sigmar. What can I say, I'm a sucker for the main characters, the examples all others are judged by, etc.
  3. Very true. You make a good case. However, I still think the knight draconis with his flaming sword is the coolest model SCE have, even if he isn't very practical. Although building the SDG with lances DOES help him to stand out more...
  4. Bah! The only true answer is swords are cooler. Swords are always cooler.
  5. I also find a further points hike to be unlikely. It would be crazy to tack on another points bump when they already told us what their points were going to be in the winter faq preview for them.
  6. Yup. This is what I have been saying. Which is why I have been so annoyed with all of these constant nerfs coming so quickly. We got our book kneecapped before any other tomes get released, and then when those tomes start to get released we see that they get a ton of rules that outclass us and look fun. It really does feel like stormcast just can't have nice things when we get hit so hard and then see what other armies get. Especially when all we have is strong war scrolls that likely will get hit by points increases early into into the tomes life. Like I said before: What are we left with when our only truly good units get hit by points nerfs? A simplistic and boring army that is also weak. Just like most of 2.0. It sure is happening fast this time around isn't it? I'm also glad I have another army to play. Looks like I am going to be playing COS for most of 3.0. Just like 2.0. It's sad. Hopefully though once the balance FAQ after the winter FAQ comes out we will get some point drops that help us. That doesn't help with the boring and simplistic aspect of our army, but at least with point drops Stormcast won't also be bad on top of all that. Maybe. Who knows what crazy stuff other tomes will get as more get released.
  7. Please try to stay respectful to other posters. Your tone here is not needed. No one has been disrespectful to you, so please refrain from essentially calling other people here dense. Being upset is one thing, but insulting other posters is quite another. As to your point, what you are talking about is lists. It's the same army, but different lists. That is the vocab we use. Just like your Stormcast example. The army is Stormcast eternals. Lists can all be different depending on the units, stormhosts, etc.
  8. Yeah, unleash hell was in no way needed. Personally I'd be fine if they just deleted it from the game. As you say, shooting did not need that kind of boost. I'd prefer if shooting took more of a back seat. I don't like how strong it is either. I play AOS to have epic melee clashes, with some arrows sprinkled in here or there. If I want to play a shooting focused game I'll go and play 40k. That said, I agree with Pjetski: As long as other OP options are around the longstrikes are needed. Unleash hell can go straight to hell though.
  9. Hey, I hope you are right and there is no war scroll rewrite. You very well could be. Fingers crossed. I personally think they are fine at the new point cost.
  10. The problem with your examples though, is the Stormcast tome was never the top of the meta. It was never a terror that lasted for an extended time frame like many of your examples. We had a few lists go 4-1 and then got nerfed. We had units and abilities get nerfed incredibly quickly. Stormcast quite literally went from a terrible army to a quite good army with our new Tome, but that lasted like a couple months and we were in no way tearing up the meta, to likely subpar again soon. Again, all indications seem to be that we will quite quickly go back to being subpar again for another whole edition with only a scant few months of being legit good between two whole editions. Here is what is going to happen: new tomes will come out and they will be more powerful than ours. Tome creep is a real thing, just look how it has affected 40k. We are going to get powered crept something fierce, especially with all our good options being hit so hard so fast. So we will likely spend most of 3.0 languishing on the lower end of the power scale. Just like 2.0. It's not a fun prospect. Our Tome is mostly devoid of fun combos and synergies and 90% of our units are either just ok or straight up trash. So we are left with a simplistic army that is over costed points wise and weak. Again, I just want Stormcast to be decent. If we average out at 3-2 that would be fine, but I doubt that is where we will end up as the edition carries on. Also, my post you quoted was addressed to those implying that we should be nerfed to spare the feelings of other armies that get hit hard by fulminators and longstrikes. My point was that it is hard to feel bad for those armies when nobody sheds a tear for us, and that nerfing our best units because other people feel bad about about how much damage our units can do isn't the best reason for said nerfs. So in essence, should we worry about how other armies feel when our powerful units are actually powerful and destroy their favorite models? Sure, we want everyone to have fun after all. But a part of me also wants to say "welcome to what's been like to run Stormcast for the past several years. You sure didn't seem to care when you ran roughshod over us." Still, like I said, it's a game and everyone should be having fun. Just would be nice if everyone would think that way.
  11. My only issue though is that no one seems to care (outside of fellow Stormcast players) when our entire army is weak and unfun to play. Such as before our new Tome. They also don't seem to care how all the nerfs ruin the experience for Stormcast players. I don't really see anyone outside of Stormcast players shedding a tear for how our army will play and feel if we get nerfed into oblivion. Not saying thats what happened yet, even if fulminators and longstrikes get nerfed. If those things happen we can still compete. The thing is, as new tomes come out we are going to get left in the dust. Again. No one seems to care about that. So while I agree that we don't want to give the feel bads to other armies, it would be nice for people to make those same considerations for us. It gets old being the whipping boy.
  12. Another thing to consider is GW has committed to doing balance changes more often, so if we do get hosed this time around, hopefully we will be get help on the next balance pass. I know it's small comfort now, but it's something.
  13. Barring a war scroll rewrite (which seems likely given the rumors) the Stormdrake guard are still good. Sadly, yes, the Vanquishers (sword dudes) are frankly terrible. Liberators are the proper pick usually due to being cheaper and we need all the points we can get. That said, vindictors are certainly not a bad choice at all. It's just that liberators being cheaper and being fairly comparable in overall effectiveness means we free up points for more elite units if we take them. Shield annihilators aren't bad, but they will melt to mortal wounds. You are better off going offensive and taking them as Grandhammers so they can likely delete whatever they get in combat with. Also, yes, the book overall has taken hit after hit and soon literally every good trick, combo, or unit will have taken some form of hit (some of it was needed, some of it wasn't), with no buffs to weak units to compensate for the poor state that most of them are in. It has really killed the enthusiasm that many of us have had for the tome. Some are still true believers and more power to them. For me, I find myself less inclined to play a book that is so new and needed this much changing this fast. It's poor business to release a book in this state. It reminds me a lot of the mentality many video game companies have about releasing an unfinished and untested product and fixing it later. This is all assuming that the rumors that Longstrikes and fulminators are getting nerfed, and we are getting no point drops in the winter faq, are true.
  14. GW doesn't deal in half measures, the nuclear option is the only option....unless you are drukari in 40k.
  15. Cool, that sounds reasonable. So likely fulminators stay despite nerf. They really are pretty important to passing the dps check.
×
×
  • Create New...