Jump to content

Heijoshin

Members
  • Posts

    152
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Heijoshin's Achievements

Protector

Protector (6/10)

135

Reputation

  1. Just to add: It is purposefully made to be interpreted as ridiculously as possible, so GW are the ones to decide what is in violation and what is not. Cast the net as wide as possible, you you can decide what you want to enforce and what not.
  2. Sure, but the point isn't necessarily that you can't criticise GW at all, and if you do GW will throw the lawyers at you. That is never the point of these sorts of things. The point of these sorts of clauses is about the cases that are in-between these two extremes (saying "im not a fan of this model" vs "GW is literally worse than *insert your own hyperbole*). This isn't a reason to bring up the whole Cursed City debacle, but where would this incident fall under? Under fair criticism? or would GW try and shut you down? I think many YTbers and personalities were commentating on how uncool it was that GW were being so silent on the matter, some went further. Some that really loved GW were saying how bad this whole situation was. Is this not "reputation damaging"? My point isn't necessarily any specific incident or possibility, but that in between the extremes are very real possibilities and if you have signed this NDA, the only judge of what is acceptable is GW. If an incident like Cursed City happens again and you've signed this NDA, you can bet there will be people who at the very least would question how much sass or criticism they're gonna put in their video. That in and of itself is bad enough. In the end it's not the whether GW will stifle all fair criticism, or criticism that is at the benefit of the consumer, it's that they can (attempt to at least). Or, people can just not sign it and make 100% honest reviews.
  3. The presumption being here that GW take on a direct currency conversion as you have done. GW just don't do that unfortunately. A 9th Edition codex from GW currently costs $50.
  4. The legality of the list seems fine, but note that you won't be able to Bludgeon and Endless Duty the same Deathrider unit. The FAQ didn't change anything about the same unit giving / receiving multiple command abilities. Only that a command ability that uses RDP can be used multiple times, only if it is given to and received by different units. Hope that makes sense.
  5. Don't worry mate, when they inevitably bring out "Totally even more Broken Realms: *insert character*", they will conveniently put them all together for you for the bargain price of 49.99. And be valid for like 3 months? If you're lucky.
  6. No, he said he suggested to renegotiate it. They turned that suggestion down. 6 months later he had left.
  7. And I agree with you that we need a new book. I just want GW to fix what is currently broken until we get it and my worry is that we won't get that. GW like to leave things a little broken, so when the next book comes out, people are even more eager to get it, thinking it will solve all our problems. Maybe a bit on the conspiracy theory side of thinking, but I imagine there is a least a smidgen of truth to it.
  8. I'm not questioning the validity of the RAW interpretation. I too also agree it is interpreted that way. It's a question of whether the RAW interpretation should take precedence when it clearly goes against the spirit of what they intended with OBR. There are many instances where GW have changed something that allows something crazy, but people have been reasonable in judging that it wasn't intended that way, and have thus ruled they won't follow it. This is one of those instances. I saw the same vid btw, and they also said that this will probably get FAQ'd in the next round. Which I also expect.
  9. This is clearly an oversight. The fact that your group has interpreted it as RAW is worrisome, regardless of whether it is technically correct or not right now.
  10. Actually it's bang on 2000, as warscroll builder still has Morghast Harbingers at 190 and not the 185 they actually are.
  11. I like it! This will depend on whether an FAQ will allow us to use these generic command abilities, but if so, this will mean that one per game both crawlers can shoot into someone charging your screen because of the Battle Regiment ability not technically being issued and a point not being spent. Noice. If we can't use Unleash Hell, then I guess this is very situational.
  12. The Good: Lieges down Katakros down (Special K stonks!) Stalkers same Harbingers down (only 5 but now counting as 2 on objectives is sweet) Arkan the same is nice. The Bad: Crawler: Kinda expected but with mystic shield changes and all the other +1 stuff flying around, I don't think it needed going up Mortek: again, expected but still stings a little and max 30 is also not the greatest Deathriders: Unnecessary increase I think The Lol: Vokmortian: Seirously, just stop GW. Make him 100 and then maybe I will think about taking him (That's a lie...I won't). The "But why???": Immortis guard: +10? But why?? The ????: Endless spells: Bye bye filling up those last 20-40 points with these, and hello possible triumph! Also Soulstealer Carrion went up by 325%! You poor poor bird Sure, I get because of the whole bound thing its good for us, but because of the new endless spell rules and endless spell max, its not gonna change anything for us to justify these increases. Would rather have lost the bound ability than these changes. The Oh God, my nerf senses are tingling: Lieges and Katakros dropping makes me feel that the FAQ may change up our RPD generation to mean liege keyword heroes do not give an extra RDP Could be good or bad, who knows, but GW often giveth and taketh away and given we got reductions for these units kinda unexpectedly, I do suspect we may see some nerf in some other way.
  13. Is it conceivable that GW, as part of a rough and dirty FAQ, just say "OBR can now use generic command abilities with command points, and RDP is spent on RDP abilities" - and they simply blanket rename all warscroll command abilities, and batteltome command abilities to "RD abilities"? - Or something to that affect. Would mean that we get access to both and that is our "thing" and retain our overabundance of points to spend on things. Would probably a bit too strong to get 2 buffs, but then again, we still dont have any shenanigans....
  14. Something something, definition of insanity, something something
×
×
  • Create New...