Jump to content

Nezzhil

Members
  • Posts

    2,263
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    19

Everything posted by Nezzhil

  1. My expectation is that if they don't rebox everything then implies Orruk Warclans will exists and the Waaagh will mantain using both keywords because Orruk Warclans was never used.
  2. A lot of armies didn't received any model during 9ed. We don't know the support during each edition and maybe because 40k get more support implies that the small releases would be reduces for AoS. At the end the number of releases per month is almost fixed year by year.
  3. Expansions is a combination of designers love and good selling product. If you are unlucky to love a faction that doesn't have a combination of both It is better if you stop expecting expansions. Expansions is not a rotation system like Corvus Belli do for Infinity.
  4. More books doesn't implies more support. Being strict more books implies less chances to received support. The number of yearly releases will be the same and the small ones will be splitted more.
  5. Two separates book would be the same. The problem was that it was a initial book like SCE, not a mixed book. We have Aeldari as an example of a mixed book that was flavour, complete and with múltiple styles of play. They never balanced with BW in mind, they started doing that after It reached the 60% of winrate and points were not touched outside Prophet, they continue decresing all Ironjawz and Kruleboyz points every Battlescroll.
  6. The problem with Ironjawz and Kruleboyz was not Big Waaagh. Most of the time of the edition Big Waaagh was worse than any of the three, and only when Magic was good and the new táctics come they become good. Without Big Waaagh the results of Ironjawz and Krule would be the same. You are looking a tree and you don't see the forest behind
  7. What if... the "weird" things that claimed @Whitefang for the next edition are new cross-allegiances factions: - Chaos Duardin: Chaos-Destruction - Malerion Daemons: Chaos-Order - Silent People: Death-Destruction - Followers of Morr: Death-Order
  8. It is unlikely. You can assume it and maybe it will happen in 20 years, but it is at the level of waiting for the return of the Squat or the Exodite Eldar.
  9. I understand the optimism, but it is not to me, I always joke about the Chaos Dwarfs but it doesn't mean I am expecting to receive them sooner or later. It is not because I hate the game or anything like that, I play a lot of my Chaos Dwarfs and it is the first time they have a real ruleset since they existed. My point here is that I am talking about the little I know, that GW works on long iterations and the specialist team more. After all, they are working on a lot of games at the same time. I want Chaos Dwarfs but I understand that working only making small releases like they are doing right now is not profitable in the long term, they need to produce new things that have a good attachment to most of the players or the game will die soon or later, that's the Horus Heresy, Blood Bowl or Necromunda strategy.
  10. They did the same with World Eaters but the Index was on the White Dwarf.
  11. https://www.warhammer-community.com/2024/04/16/play-the-chosen-of-slaanesh-in-chaos-space-marines-armies-with-index-emperors-children/ They just "leaked" the next 40k faction. Emperor's Children will get an Index because they are not included in the Chaos Space Marines Codex anymore
  12. Sorry, but this is the same as the "Kurnothi return in a big wave". The return of Legacy soon than later implies that all the work they are doing right now will be delayed or removed from the pipeline. They must be working in the 5-6 year of the game right now. I say always the same, saying multiple times something would not make that true, it is like Spanish community claiming for the translation of the Core Book, because they are making noise doesn't mean it could happen because, the only we know it is that the translation was not in the pipeline, and GW works always in a longterm plan. It is not true that is a smaller invest than a new faction because we don't know the state of the old molds. People is thinking that Old World is cheap and they don't know the reality, it is only their perception.
  13. Valrak with ToW would believe anything that says that something bad would happen to AoS. I will be very cautious with something related to new factions or legend factions right now.
  14. The new ones are more balanced, proportions are better and have the classic size. The first one are enormous and have really bad proportions. In term of design the first ones are caricatures and doesn't match the global design of the GW design.
  15. People is making conspiracies all the time about ToW, miniaturas, squatting and a lot of things like this. I was claiming that is all more easy than that and nones need to worry
  16. They are gonna release the metal trolls, and the photos on journal and core rules are using the 3rd edition River ones. I think he had a mistake, they are similar.
  17. That's was expected but It is not the full Greenskins release. We will have a small third one in the near future. As I said before, none of the AoS-Fantasy models will be removed in the near future. I hope we stop with the rumours of ToW that implies a new AoS-crisis. AoS and ToW have a clear roadmap and we know all the pieces for the years. Time to updated Da List.
  18. Greenskins' second wave comes before the dwarfs. It is almost imposible to start a Greenskins army right now.
  19. No. That implies daemons and Chorfs that are not gonna return to ToW
  20. A series of campaign books for ToW was on the pipeline since the beginning. That rumour is not a rumour, It is like saying that AoS next edition will have Battletomes
×
×
  • Create New...