Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

285 Celestant-Prime

1 Follower

About Dreadmund

  • Rank
    Dracothian Guard

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Yeah, you use the same attack profile. It just adds the extra effect for one volley of attacks.
  2. Finished my Shrine Luminor last night. Feels good to have the two huge models in my army done. After this and Teclis, I'm going to treat myself to a nice, straightforward Loreseeker 😅
  3. Yes, but its in a new mod so you need to search the workshop again 👍
  4. I'm building towards a Non-Teclis Vanari army eventually. I love their rules and their cohesive design. The Lord Regent opens up so many possibilities IMO, saving spellcasts for other units you can potentially get some crazy buffs up.
  5. I finished Teclis yesterday, all ready for his reinforcements. I love this model, but it will be a relief to do some more battleline 😂 I have an extra long weekend booked for next week to get really stuck in on the new models. I can't wait to pain the Shrine Luminor!
  6. I think the Loreseeker is Unique because although not a named character, Loreseekers are solitary and far ranging so from a narrative perspective there shouldn't be more than one near the same battlefield at any given time. It would be good if they FAQ this just to clear it up for sure so that new players don't keep getting confused about it.
  7. Neither does, say, a Cathallar though. Inspiring presence is drawn from the core rules, not their warscroll or alliegence abilities.
  8. Regarding this rule from the new Shrine Luminor, who is actually "using" the command ability for things like Inspiring Presence and On the Double? So for example, lets say I want to use inspiring presence on a unit of wardens and they are in range of a hero garrisoned within the Shrine. Are the Wardens the one's "using" the command ability making it cost 1CP, or is it the hero in the shrine using it ON them, meaning it costs me nothing? I would assume the latter, but I wanted to be sure.
  9. I didn't mean in this thread, but i have seen negativity about in group chats/Twitter. Maybe I shouldn't expect better from nerds on the internet, but I don't see how you could read the previews from this week and be anything but pleased.
  10. I'm really surprised at how much negativity I'm seeing about the new LRL rules from LRL players. Fair enough if you're a beasts of chaos player seeing our rules previews and getting a bit salty, but why are we getting upset? 😕 Who sees that we're going to have access to shooting cavalry that can retreat 6 inches in the combat phase with fly and says "I am disappointed"? And it's not from people who think we're going to be a little too good for the balance of the game, it's from people who expected better. I truly don't understand. Some people are just addicted to whinging.
  11. This was actually playing with my Tzeentch before the newest book but yeah. They didn't even seem happy when they won. No pleasing the hardcore gamers I guess!
  12. A pet peeve of mine. I played in an event when I won 1 game and lost 4, and all 4 of the losses I spent the whole game listening to my opponent list all the reasons my army was bent and impossible to win against.
  13. Preview today said that Maggotkin will be getting new warscrolls in the next broken realms book! Personally I hope they don't touch blightkings at all, and we get re-writes for all the Daemons that don't get played like Nurglings, Beasts of Nurgle and the 3 heralds.
  14. A completed unit of wardens. So in love with these models.
  • Create New...