Jump to content

Mutter

Members
  • Posts

    215
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Mutter

  1. With Gimp you could do that, but it would be a lot of work. What was used in the thread you qoted is Battle Chronicler: http://battlechronicler.com/
  2. Why not exchange the GK and one of the courtiers to an Archregent that calls in a Varghulf? Obviously, you'de lose the +1 attack spell, but gain so much more (most importantly, spare points, which this list doesn't have many of). I'd assumed in BJs list that maybe he didn't have a second AR so soon after release.
  3. I think combatwise, the GKoTG is potentially so much better than the ZD, I'd definitely go for the TG.
  4. Check a couple pages back. FEC list from Sheffield (Ben Johnson) was Royal Menagerie. Came second place, iirc.
  5. Ah, okay then. So the math stays the same. It's a wash ...
  6. If those 30 had 2 attacks, it comes out the same. If you had buffed them to 3 attacks, the 30 would come out ahead. But max unit size is 20, so I'm not sure what you're thinking about?
  7. That would be so boss!
  8. This is correct. If you go back a couple of pages, this was discussed quite a bit, detailing what advantages such a set-up might have.
  9. See, if you would have put a quarter of the energy you just spent arguing with me into your intital post, this would have never happened. But really, this is the last I will say about this. It isn't really worth it, you know?
  10. There is always the possibility to ask, or to elaborate. Just firing off one-word answers to a new member is just not very welcoming. Surely you must be able to see that?
  11. Telling somebody who starts with the hobby to magnetize Horrors/Flayers seems a bit ... inappropriate. But maybe that's just me. Yes, in small groups Flayers are better. Also, when summoning them in from the sides/back, the can get to stuff faster than Horrors can.
  12. Don't think that's gonna happen. FEC and NH don't really go together. And with Deadwalkers, Deathlords and Deathmages, GW has already shown the direction they see for FEC.
  13. Plus, it was played by Ben Johnson, who's been around like forever and a real veteran. I think it's strong list, but I'm not sure it's the strongest list FEC can deliver. Time will tell.
  14. Yes, makes sense, because it has re-summons AND powerful big beasties.
  15. Most people claim 1000 points is not balanced period. Anything that summons (or re-summons) gets vastly more powerful at that level. Anything that has big beasties is also a lot more powerful than in 2000 points.
  16. Don't think Legions of Nagash get any hate, it's just Nagash himself that isn't well liked. The book is certainly strong, but no S-tier without Nagash. And a lot of people just feel fatigued playing against the same list over and over again (very little variation in Nagash tournament lists) and the battle just being about that one model. Kill Nagash early enough, you win. Don't kill him, you most likely lose. Some people just think that there's more exciting battles to be had ...
  17. Unless you're up against a very shooty army and want to use woods as LOS-blockers. Wings means you'll still be shot, a mount wouldn't.
  18. Very viable. Add the casters (branchwhyches & brachwraiths, which are basically also almost dryads) and Durthu plus Alarielle (which would be awesome riding some Merwyrm, coming from the sea), and you have more or less a cookie-cutter tournament list. Beware of the fact though, that there are rumours that a new battletome might be coming soon. And then, nobody knows what's viable and what isn't.
  19. No, it has to be a Plague Priest on foot. As a rule, if something is written in Caps Lock, it's a keyword and then it can be anything with that keyword. If it is written normally, it has to be that exact warscroll.
×
×
  • Create New...