Jump to content

123lac

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    332

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by 123lac

  1. 123lac
    Been out of the loop for quite some time, but can blades of khorne make use of the slaves to darkness units without any penalties or having to ally them in? The new warriors and chosen look amazing.
  2. 123lac
    Agreed. 5 year old stormcast sculpts did not need a redesign, especially when so many factions still have ancient sculpts. AoS is setting a precedent for continuous SCE updates while other factions languish with neglect.
  3. 123lac
    A big refresh for Seraphon would have been ideal to tie in with the Kragnos book. The new Kroak model looks amazing, but the saurus warriors and knights look like something from the flinstones.
  4. 123lac
    Agreed.
  5. 123lac
    SCE do not need updated models when they have the largest range and one of the newest ranges in general. 3 years is not a long period of time for an army to go without new models. Also, they got a new hero only a few weeks ago so IDK what you mean by 3 years. SCE are very much the AoS version of marines. Every starter box includes them, they get the most new models, the most frequent model refreshes and overall the most battle tomes of any army.
  6. 123lac
    Thank you. Well said. I strongly disagree with making BoC destruction. Would take away a huge part of what makes them unique.
  7. 123lac
    Yeah but fundamentally beasts of chaos are the wild version of chaos. The pure version in a sense. Beasts of chaos just need some proper love from gw.
  8. 123lac
    I heard a rumour that the AoS 3.0 rumour is BS...
  9. 123lac
    Gravelords release with plastic blood knights and hopefully updated skeleton and zombie kits. What else needs updating from that range? The wight king on foot?
  10. 123lac
    Bloody brilliant!
  11. 123lac
    Ya but if they get new models for CoS then at least you'll know that the faction has a genuine future. As it stands it's just a bunch of old models thrown into a soup book. Lore-wise I love CoS but model-wise it's just old and busted sculpts at this point.
  12. 123lac
    Imagine cities of sigmar getting new models...!
  13. 123lac
    A couple of new heroes per book, yeah.
  14. 123lac
    You gotta do conversions I guess and it looks like a pretty great kit for doing conversions. Tbh I think the only thing that's unsustainable about the kit is the price.
  15. 123lac
    Pretty much. In terms of balance, I don't think it's unreasonable to expect them to be capable of having a meta where the lowest armies sit at 45% win rate and the top tier armies sit at 55% win rate. I mean compare any of the top tier factions to Beasts of Chaos. It's just too unfair to those who are invested in the bottom tier factions.
  16. 123lac
    It's sad if you're right, given how much play testing appears to have gone into 40k 9th edition. Give the illusion of trying to balance your game, only to deliberately engineer imbalance to sell the latest hotness. Kind of nefarious.
  17. 123lac
    You legend. Summed up everything I wanted to say on the topic and more. Thank you.
  18. 123lac
    https://www.warhammer-community.com/2020/10/22/metawatch-warhammer-age-of-sigmar-1-list-building-with-dan-street/ If AoS were a video game, no one would play it given the current imbalance. Can you imagine dota/league/sc2 having the following 'meta': This is just embarrassing on behalf of GW's rules writers.
  19. 123lac
    I just roll my eyes every time I read someone say something along the lines of "but golf is so much more expensive!". Yes, collecting antique Ferraris is also an expensive hobby, but that has absolutely nothing to do with whether Warhammer is overpriced.
  20. 123lac
    Well my friend, I would like to see GW charge less for the gargants so that you can buy one and enjoy it without having to save up for too long or go without too many of those coffees
  21. 123lac
    No, there must be a point where something is either fair value or overpriced. It might not be a specific point down to the exact dollar, but it's there nonetheless, because fundamentally 99.9% of us do not have infinite money. Your argument that you wouldn't pick up a gargant for $1 is irrelevant. Obviously I am considering fair value from the perspective of a hobbyist who wants one. What would your price ceiling have been for Teclis?
  22. 123lac
    Yeah, I could get a Bloodthirster for $170 or a Mega ripoff for $320. The disparity is absurd.
  23. 123lac
    Yes money is a means of purchasing things, but some things are more important than other things and one has to prioritise spending when one does not have infinite money. I'd like to hear what your priced out point would be, by the way. How expensive would the mega gargant have to be before you firmly said no to buying it?
  24. 123lac
    Global pandemic = absolute gold rush for GW.
  25. 123lac
    Sorry, but this falls into a) as it involves wasting a finite resource. Curious to know what the 'priced out' point is for some of the more die hard fanboys. Is it $1000 for one kit? $2000? $5000? There has to be a point, unless you're a billionaire.
×
×
  • Create New...