Jump to content

Skreech Verminking

Members
  • Posts

    5,252
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by Skreech Verminking

  1. Same it is quit sad and personally I don’t quit get why they chose boc and bonesplittaz specifically. as for the skaven well here are my thoughts what I think got canish from the skaven range the rest might get updated. considering that plague monks and night runners are staying, if we believe that gw hasn’t forgotten to put any of those units onto tje table that got announced. I’d say we’ll be loosing: -rat swarms - gutter runners -plague censer bearers -warlock engineer without a replacement. This of course isn’t the truth and just a guess
  2. I mean if it comes to the competitive system of warhammer in total, I’d say the horus heresy and tow communities are quit fun. their answer to gws announcement of some armies not being allowed at tournament was laughter edit: and by laughter I mean they laughed at their face and ignored that announcement
  3. I have a feeling there might be more of an interna conflict between the different teams working on tow and aos.
  4. About that, I’m amazed we haven’t seem any skaven models being revealed so far. not after this pole has been announced
  5. Well then there will more devestated beast players then we have fyreslayer players😂 Well…… the savege orruks are basically hidden behind a wall of upgrades you’d have to choose for a unit of normal orks
  6. Thanks, as soon as the empire gets their models back I’ll happily share some pics
  7. I mean we did teach you guys to fight😂. so I definitely feel welcome, and about that, I’m likely going to build up a swiss Reichsläufer army for tow. its more of a fun project rather then something I’m trying to keep as warhammer lore accurate as possible (or swiss history accurate either way) Basically I’ll be combining different bricks of infantry with each having a different kantonal flag (kantons can be considered similar to what a state is in the united states).
  8. I mean that’s a great point and definitely something we can consider putting into many game system, still that isn’t chancing my own distaste to the current existing double turn. like stated before I have never yet seen that tactical genius most people tend to state they have seen. i’ve taken part at 25 tournaments since this edition had its run and played between that around the 200ish more games (casual and competitive, although in the end it went more towards the casual direction). and still I have not met those conditions, maybe its because I play the wring army, list or my opponent was just playing the game wrong, very aggressively etc. but in the end with all the factors I have so far seen and witnessed, I don’t like the current double turn as it is. that doesn’t mean I believe that it has to go outright, I personally just believe the benefits of not having the double turn or the negative of taking the double turn should be somewhat higher then it currently is. maybe gw has found a way to do so for 4th but without knowing or having played the fourth edition I’ll stick with the third edition and just state as the current double turn is I personally don’t like it (Oh and by inbetween that I mean I’ve played 200 ish non tournament/event games during the third edition +the 68 games of conpetitive games (games I participated at tournaments)
  9. That may be so, but I never said I blame the double turn, just that I currently don’t like it from the experience I had. And if you want to know more see my first post on the double turn
  10. Pretty much skaven, if my name didn’t already hint towards it
  11. Yep exactly like I said, I’ve never seen the things you have described. that example is probably the closest to what I had with my opponent not taking the double, out of fear I might double him later. and as you have said it if the double didn’t exist, well the outcome for at least that one game would have been the same. although maybe the thoughts would have been different. But possibilities if we would have ignored the double turn function in a long ago past time, seems to be not that easy, especially not when it has been a few years and the thoughts that we could have had if we removed a factor or added something else to the game isn’t easy to figure out without trying
  12. I guess my club never went away from the kitchen table then😂. we’ve got around 20 people of 40ish that are playing 40k and aos with legacy/legend units, me included
  13. Say while not necessarily a landsknecht yet, can a fellow Reichsläufer join the discussion as well😜
  14. Well I can only talk from my own experience. if thats is what you have so far experience, great for you. I wish I could say the same thing but so far it hasn’t happened to me. funnily enough there was one game where my opponent gave me turn priority. although more for the reason that he wanted to fight me before I get to him, and I chose not to move anything for 4 turns. i just stood there in the backlines looking goofy at his army, while he did the same thing. that game ended in a draw it was the fastest game I ever played at a tournament in second edition
  15. I mean its not my taste, but apparently some people really like the mix of all daemons
  16. And not to mention mixed daemons of chaos! (I’m not joking we genuinely have 5 new people (quite young even) who started aos with daemons of slaanesh and khorne mixed together
  17. I believe to have read a statement from the old world times where they basically mentioned how there are a total of 4 steam tanks in the empire, so yeah rhe production definitely i creased since then😂
  18. Having seen stormcast getting their models edition in and out. I think it would be just far to give another faction the chance. personally my idea wouldn’t be to choose a single specific faction that replaces the stormy marines, but rather having a different faction each edition that would represent the good and evil side. maybe even have two armies that are neither fighting for the grand allegiance of order.
  19. Definitely although I mean more like we have seem then edition in and out. wouldn’t it be more interesting, especially for making up theories if another army or factions gets a chance. considering we have a few that could definitely use an update or some extra models, a starter with them instead of the marines wouldn’t be a bad idea in my own opinion
  20. I mean considering the stormy marines releases. can one even get excited about that factions releases anymore?
  21. I look at that kit and the only thought I had was, eh could easily fit i to old world as well. I guess skaven are just this one awesome concept that can’t really be changed. truly the real poster boys of aos.
  22. As the double turn currently is, I don’t like it. personally I have heard of so many people stating that it has a some what in depth tactic, yet I haven’t seen a single person ever taking the consideration of just not taking the double turn when it happened. this is the case for both casual and tournament level play I have seen, taken part in and witnessed. Currently as it stands, there is no incentive of just not taking the double turn. the benefits of taking it are much greater then thr negatives it comes with.
  23. To answer gws question, its not a skaven👐🏻
  24. Gw like: look at these new meatshieldtilators with great weapons
  25. Looking at this model, only makes me question, when the skaven will get their showcase of new models
×
×
  • Create New...