daedalus81 Posted January 13, 2017 Share Posted January 13, 2017 If you watch the stream from yesterday at 2 hours and 1 minute Andy from the community team is on. He talks about having interactive FAQs where users can vote on topics and answers as well as commenting on articles and more. It's also good for hilarious comments like 'as Games Workshop we've only just discovered the internet' if you start it around 1h 57 mark. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Not sure how much I like the community voting on a answer to a faq. In the case of the sylvaneth Wyldwood, the answer felt obviously what they faq'd it to, to a few, but to a vocal number of people they claimed op and broken strong when it is not so. So a army could be ruined or largely nerfed simply by a majority of (for lack of better term ) uneducated players who have seen/read something and theorised that it is broken, without properly playing against it and seeing it in practice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Furthermore, I will probably take some slack for saying this, but one persons vote isn't worth as much as another's. For instance you could have someone who has never played the army in question, against the army in question or very many games at all. Or someone who has never played a game having a vote against someone who has been playing for years, against people at various levels from beginner to tournament master, who has a much greater understanding or the rules and balance. Those votes on a subject hold massively different levels of weight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nico Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Quote Not sure how much I like the community voting on a answer to a faq. In the case of the sylvaneth Wyldwood, the answer felt obviously what they faq'd it to, to a few, but to a vocal number of people they claimed op and broken strong when it is not so. Death would be lucky to survive such an FAQ still being able to cast spells Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arkiham Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 God yeah that death spell casting. So op. Needs such a hard nerf. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BaldoBeardo Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Oh no, you do *not* want people voting on FAQ.Great in theory, but the past couple of years have pretty amply demonstrated the majority opinion isn't necessarily the right or logical one.Games or democracy...Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nevvermore Posted January 14, 2017 Share Posted January 14, 2017 Did he mean votes to decide which questions get prioritised, or did he mean votes to decide the actual ruling? My guess would be the former. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daedalus81 Posted January 14, 2017 Author Share Posted January 14, 2017 Right I don't think he meant the crowd gets final say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmimzie Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 What an FAQ that aftually answers the most frequently asked questions what world is this... did i forget to put on the red slippers after leaving the house this morning?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.