Ciotola Posted February 22, 2021 Share Posted February 22, 2021 hello, why in many forums, fb pages and various social networks the majority of the community thinks according to the 2000 points? let's clarify the reason: at 2000 the competitive is balanced, it is the one played in tournaments and gw sells more and is happy. but what always leaves me confused is the following situation: 1: "hello I'm looking for 1000 pt competitive lists" 2: "there is no competitive 1000 pt" 1: "so at 1000 points you are not able to think about what is strong and breaks the meta? Or if there are mini combos that can be implemented to take advantage of the opponent? And who plays 2v2 how does he do it?" 1: "there is no competitive 1000 points" would someone be able to explain to me why most of the players do not know how to reason lists below 2k points? is it really that hard to figure out what's strong in the half of the standard points? I'm not clarifying a meta / tier list (which in any case arises as a consequence of the reasoning about what is strong in the chosen format, ergo it can exist at 1000 pt) I ask nevertheless not most of the players can not build a list that has strengths , a minimum of synergies, cohesion and meaning at 1000 pt thanks for the answer, I hope to find a more reasoned answer than "1000 pt is not competitive" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.