Jump to content

Who was to blame for the death of the world that was?


Recommended Posts

In my opinion Sigmar is to blame. The path Archaon followed was inevitable given everything he went through. Archaon was a good man in his early days under the guise of kastner.  Sigmar did nothing but allowed it to happen. I’d understand if others considered lileath or even teclis to be at fault, but for me the buck stops with Sigmar.

What are your thoughts? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply
31 minutes ago, NurglesFirstChosen said:

In my opinion Sigmar is to blame. The path Archaon followed was inevitable given everything he went through. Archaon was a good man in his early days under the guise of kastner.  Sigmar did nothing but allowed it to happen. I’d understand if others considered lileath or even teclis to be at fault, but for me the buck stops with Sigmar.

What are your thoughts? 

Wasebt Sigmar trapped by Tzeentch in the vortex? 

Althou he seemed to be able to influence events throughout the empires history I doubt he had the power to prevent something as dates as Archaons rise.

You could argue it's Archaon aka diedricks fault for giving in to his fate rather than fighting it. Although if you read the novels you see that wasebt as easy as all that

Teclis is the one responsible.for the world being destroyed when it was but things seem to be heading that way long before then. I think Teclis merely gambled time for his gambit. Archaic still would have taken middenhiem eventually the artefact would have been activated nd there would have been no incarnates to even attempt to reverse.

 

I blaim manfred because he had a real choice to make that could have changed the course of history and made a terrible one for pretty petty reasons.(that an I'm an arkan fan)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, xking said:

How is sigmar to be blamed for something he had no power over? You know, with him being trapped in a magical vortex.  Also  Archaon is to be blamed, he is responsible for his own choices and actions.

Ok maybe I should word it differently as Sigmars followers

Archaon was an amazing example of what a knight should be early in his life. From the defence of Nils the original Kasters squire, to his insistence that inspite of the original Kastners past that he and Nils attempt to save him. 

Later when Kastner and Emil went to purge the beastmen encampment, Kastner was still a man of Sigmar. The shard of tainted herdstone that lodged in his eye socket was the start. Then his treatment at the hands of the templars on the road to altdorf threw him to the wolves. This was compounded by finding that the  templars has massacred the people from the Kastner estate (mainly women and children).

It was inevitable that he would fall after all the trauma he experienced at the hands of sigmars people. Sigmars representatives  had a large hand in the fall of many of Chaos’s champions, archaon and the glottkin are good examples of this. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great topic!

I think, apart from Archaon and Mannfred, the world couldnt have been destroyed without the actions of the skaven. All but wiping out the slann and dwarf empires, both forces who could have stood firmly against Chaos, blowing up Morrslieb, and then allying with Archaon and killing Valten...! And foiling Nagash's schemes yet again! They basically did almost all the heavy lifting to allow Archaon to reach the artefact (literally, they even dug it out for him!)

Damn their furry hides! ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Captain Marius said:

Great topic!

I think, apart from Archaon and Mannfred, the world couldnt have been destroyed without the actions of the skaven. All but wiping out the slann and dwarf empires, both forces who could have stood firmly against Chaos, blowing up Morrslieb, and then allying with Archaon and killing Valten...! And foiling Nagash's schemes yet again! They basically did almost all the heavy lifting to allow Archaon to reach the artefact (literally, they even dug it out for him!)

Damn their furry hides! ?

Bah! They are responsible and just manipulated archaon. It was a most cunning plan that fooled everybody  even the writers, yes-yes! ?

remember the great horned rat came out the ‘ best’ in all of this. He finally claimed his place in the fantastic four. ?The next step in his plan for world domination! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Captain Marius said:

Great topic!

I think, apart from Archaon and Mannfred, the world couldnt have been destroyed without the actions of the skaven. All but wiping out the slann and dwarf empires, both forces who could have stood firmly against Chaos, blowing up Morrslieb, and then allying with Archaon and killing Valten...! And foiling Nagash's schemes yet again! They basically did almost all the heavy lifting to allow Archaon to reach the artefact (literally, they even dug it out for him!)

Was that a praise? Thank-Thank you. You will be spared when we-we conquer the Mortal Realms too ( by spared we mean enslaved rather than killed.)

8 minutes ago, Captain Marius said:

Damn their furry hides! ?

Awww, and you were doing so well. :) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, NurglesFirstChosen said:

As much as I dislike teclis, he was manipulated by Lileath so was nothing but a pawn in most of his actions. 

I know the broad strokes of end times but never read the book, so apologies for what may be a stupid question. But why is everyone sayin Teclis? Was he not attempting a ritual to stop the end of the world?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClockworkGeo91 said:

I know the broad strokes of end times but never read the book, so apologies for what may be a stupid question. But why is everyone sayin Teclis? Was he not attempting a ritual to stop the end of the world?

Been a while since I read them but wasn't he meddling to save the elves and let chaos consume everybody else

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClockworkGeo91 said:

I know the broad strokes of end times but never read the book, so apologies for what may be a stupid question. But why is everyone sayin Teclis? Was he not attempting a ritual to stop the end of the world?

Yeah he tried. But the whole Teclis storyline was riddled with references to it being a gamble, not being sure of it working etc. So he was pretty much set up by the writer to add a sense of desperation to the ‘good guys’.

and since the world ended you can probably guess how the gamble ended up ;) I read them last year for the first time and would def recommend them 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


×
×
  • Create New...