hughwyeth Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 5 minutes ago, sal4m4nd3r said: One a general note.. the player who placed first with that Nurgle list must be a GREAt tactician or several units I thought were ad/extremely points inefficient are the opposite because I cant re-call any Nurgle list that has sniffed the top of competetive events using Lord of afflictions and nurglings. I get a sense, more and more, that's it's a very underappreciated character, especially combined with drones. It's a better choice than a daemon prince (which is what I use for my drones) I think. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ledha Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 8 minutes ago, sal4m4nd3r said: A Is skryre a hard counter to nurgle? I suppose a mortal nurle list (such as a plagetouched warband) but I thought a nurgle demon list would be really strong against them! As a mortal nurgle player... Im terrified of facing skryre. Chnagehost is simply a smile and nod (dog in burning pub sort of expression) and wait for the imminent result. One a general note.. the player who placed first with that Nurgle list must be a GREAt tactician or several units I thought were ad/extremely points inefficient are the opposite because I cant re-call any Nurgle list that has sniffed the top of competetive events using Lord of afflictions and nurglings. Sorry, i should have precised that i was speaking about the stardrake list. As the nurgle one, i don't know nurgle well enough to speak about it. But it seems very solid and fine. Lord of affliction can be hard to remove and is very mobile, he is perfect to charge a big blob on the corner and tie it down without any rosk of being killed. The nurgling are useful to capture and hold a objective far away from the (somewhat slow) army, nd thei ability to full regen wound if not killed mean the ennemy can't kill them little by little, and you don't want to see 30 plaguebearers, 5 blightking or 6 drones running away to capture a objective. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RuneBrush Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 1 hour ago, sal4m4nd3r said: One a general note.. the player who placed first with that Nurgle list must be a GREAT tactician or several units I thought were bad/extremely points inefficient are the opposite because I cant re-call any Nurgle list that has sniffed the top of competetive events using Lord of afflictions and nurglings. That was Martin Morrin who's part of WHTV (I believe he's Ceri's manager), so in fairness likely gets a lot more practice games in than most of us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thanatos Ares Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 Yes did get the sweet Warhammer tv dice (bag of 10) so super chuffed! ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antipodean7 Posted April 16, 2018 Author Share Posted April 16, 2018 10 hours ago, Chris Tomlin said: Does Orruks relate to Ironjawz or Bonesplitterz do you know? Also, what's a "Goblin" haha! Looking forward to your report @Nico, great result. I don’t know sorry Chris. Ceri posted the spreadsheet pic on Twitter, so you’d have to ask the Warhammer world team... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hystarion Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 I don't get why they don't write down allegiances on the results sheet like they did before. Why this new trend ? It was the same at Adepticon... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlasticCraic Posted April 16, 2018 Share Posted April 16, 2018 1 hour ago, Hystarion said: I don't get why they don't write down allegiances on the results sheet like they did before. Why this new trend ? It was the same at Adepticon... Totally agree! There is a real thirst for that info. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vesco Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 What about Sylvaneth? haven't seen them in competitive for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Tomlin Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 11 hours ago, Hystarion said: I don't get why they don't write down allegiances on the results sheet like they did before. Why this new trend ? It was the same at Adepticon... Agreed. I find it really annoying. Hard to get much from looking at the results. 11 hours ago, Antipodean7 said: I don’t know sorry Chris. Ceri posted the spreadsheet pic on Twitter, so you’d have to ask the Warhammer world team... Goblins GW? Come on!!! We haven't had Goblins in Warhammer for three years! Haha Real shame they didn't consider it worth differentiating between the different flavours of Orruk as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antipodean7 Posted April 17, 2018 Author Share Posted April 17, 2018 Top post now updated with pictures of Danny Cashman's award winning army. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morglum StormBasha Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 At heat one they had all the allegiances listed I’m not sure why they couldn’t be bothered this time? Will make the bad dice rankings a bit difficult as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Taylor Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 6 minutes ago, Morglum StormBasha said: At heat one they had all the allegiances listed I’m not sure why they couldn’t be bothered this time? Will make the bad dice rankings a bit difficult as well. I suspect John didn't have his usual team with him when running the event or may have been short staffed. Guessing they were more interested in getting the scores done correctly than sorting this bit out and whilst it's annoying for us to analyse the event after it's happened, it's not something you would be bothered about on the day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Tomlin Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 33 minutes ago, Gaz Taylor said: I suspect John didn't have his usual team with him when running the event or may have been short staffed. Guessing they were more interested in getting the scores done correctly than sorting this bit out and whilst it's annoying for us to analyse the event after it's happened, it's not something you would be bothered about on the day Disagree. You sort the scores after each round in preparation for the next one. After that you have time whilst games are being played to update your spread sheet with this sort of information and as a TO myself, I consider it extremely important. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaz Taylor Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 8 minutes ago, Chris Tomlin said: Disagree. You sort the scores after each round in preparation for the next one. After that you have time whilst games are being played to update your spread sheet with this sort of information and as a TO myself, I consider it extremely important. I was only guessing why it wasn't done! But if it was somebody who wasn't experienced with it or with Age of Sigmar, they may not know this. I can only imagine if it was something I had to do and I think I would struggle with a 100+ player event (well any event too be honest!). Sure they will take it on board for next event Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morglum StormBasha Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 I’d genuinely be happy to volunteer to help if they struggle with this at tourneys it’s only adding one value next to the name of the player in the spreadsheet - would take about an hour to do that for everyone. What are they spending the first 2.5 hours doing if not creating that list in excel? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malakree Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 Could be they didn't want to clutter the page after adding the soft scores. Agree it's irritating, wana see those army breakdowns ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morglum StormBasha Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 You’d think they’d want the data analytics themselves . They must have that column just hidden it in what was posted to print it out Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PlasticCraic Posted April 17, 2018 Share Posted April 17, 2018 On 4/16/2018 at 5:53 PM, Malakree said: Any idea where the top destro finished, was nicky still playing wanderers? Nicky played Kunnin Rukk. If I was a gambling man I'd guess he was top Destro at 27, but I obviously can't say for sure. Nicky didn't take the Bloodtoofs (so he wasn't one drop), he took a BWV and a likely Triumph instead this time. There were 3x Maniak Weirdnobs in the list, so I'm thinking the Balewind was used to give a hero phase push, then a 20" range on the reroll 1s buffing all three blocks of Arrow Boys simultaneously (using the other two casters for Brutal Beast Spirits and Hand of Gork). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.