Jump to content

Holy_Diver

Members
  • Posts

    207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Holy_Diver's Achievements

Protector

Protector (6/10)

131

Reputation

  1. Guys, replying to each of you would lead to opening a separate topic. As someone else said, for me let's forget about the discrepancies between aesthetic opinions, because the issue is taking a ridiculous turn. I don't give a damn about explaining to some random guys on the internet what the rules are for defining a feminine form or not (I have the professional skills to do it, I'm a concept artist). Having said that, back to topic and peace! 👍
  2. Yep, I could 😁 Instead,I hope you will be kind enough to explain this unhappy expression that no one felt the need for.
  3. Ah, that "that 1 degree tilt" is a "boob-plate". Ooooook, thanks for teaching me this, mr Smith 🤭 In any case, there seems to be two schools of thought around here, "those who demand specific concepts" and "those who are more generalist". I'm part of the first and I don't think I've gone off topic in talking about a miniature that has yet to be released. @GloomkingWortwazi In a place that thrives on the exchange of points of view I find it a little childish to take it personally if a user writes a non-biased reflection (therefore ignoring anything that has happened here in the past). For me the miniature is cool, but whoever conceived it was very lazy and this is an unquestionable fact: he simply took a Chaos Lord on Karkadrak and a Varanguard and mixed them, that's it.
  4. I mean, I simply expressed an opinion on a model that is very cool for me, but which has the flaw of being unnecessarily generic. I've been following aos since 2015 and I still remember when the new Alarielle came out, it was objectively a shock, because it was a super specific sculpture, which left nothing to chance.
  5. I really can't see "these traits", boob plate+feminine face, you noticed in the model, guys 😕 (I'm serious, not joking)
  6. Simple, forget the name for a moment and look only at the figure: what tells you that'a a woman warrior? Mine is not a rant or complaint, GW simply has the potential to be the "least generic possible", it has demonstrated this many times (if you need examples of objectively female figures I'll give you some without any problems), but sometimes it seems to be lazy in concepts.
  7. She needs a better color scheme, this is full of boring colors. And a little personal touch: the sculture is awesome, but why make female characters that don't have ANY feminine traits? It's non sense.
  8. Even so: zero problems, I have both. The only thing they are very late of doing is refresh "World War II's old models". BUT...if the new narrative brings back a guy named Morghur...well, will be appreciated
  9. RatCast confirmed. Thank you Vince Venturella.
  10. 100% they will have invented something to reduce the number of warscrolls present in the tome, because most of them are useless on a conceptual level (not even in terms of rules). As I already said, taking inspiration from the skull helmet of Ionus and the relictor, in my opinion we will see the death company stormcast. A chamber dedicated to those who have gone mad over the centuries and whom Sigmar continues to exploit as mindless weapons (Sigmar lied!)
  11. Am I the only one excited to meet my Lady of Ruin? For me it's like a first date with a top model. I've never been a fan of rat guys.
  12. I hope this time they take inspiration from the cyclical success of the 40k boxes. No cards, no special characters and lots of variety, in both factions. But above all: BIG MODELS! ps: I think we'll see "the stormcast death company" in the ruination chamber, I have this feeling.
  13. With dawnbringers? It's already more miniatures than the human race needed.
  14. Dunno, I hope dawn bringer 5 is more than "mrs. No-one-asked-for". At the end of 3rd I wanna coount how many order models GW put out, compared to other factions.
×
×
  • Create New...