Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Welcome Guest!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?


  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Killax last won the day on February 26

Killax had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

2,430 Celestant-Prime


About Killax

  • Rank
    Lord Celestant
  • Birthday 08/10/1988

Recent Profile Visitors

1,690 profile views
  1. Killax

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    It didnt change. Meme edition ftw! 😛
  2. Killax

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    And now he can stop face, practically always succeed in his charges and keep you at bay. Fun times at GW. Fun times indeed. Is this how Death felt when GH2017 curbed them into nothingness? Is this how Destruction feels since end of GH2016? You did check all the bonusses you get on top of that? You do understand that currently there is no Artifact that even compairs to the whole slew of bonuses?
  3. Killax

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    Not really. I mean some bias will always be around with Games Workshop. But if it's at the cost of the actual fan-base I'm leaving it as is until better times. Basically first making an article abour Khorne not claiming any skulls is one thing, but then make an article where they almost feel sorry for Chaos is another... It's cool that AoS2 will now first focus on Order and Death. But I don't play those armies, so I will not focus my time on AoS2. There is no real point in it like this. For the life of me I do not know how long this will continue either. If your looking for a superior close combat army! Nurgle is the way, that's all. It's like getting two scoops of ice cream where we can suck on an ice cube Ah well Khorne has been fun under GH2016. I wont forget.
  4. Killax

    AoS 2 - Maggotkin of Nurgle Discussion

    320 points for the Mammoth in Nurgle is the best. But hey, it's a nice meme edition to be in. Welcome Nurgle, you new Tzeentch now!
  5. Killax

    AoS 2 - Maggotkin of Nurgle Discussion

    Yup You basically have two Allegiance Abilities for the price of none! So yeah, certainly enjoy your new army! As you arn't only a Maggotkin Player but now more a Maggotkin Tamukan Horde Hyper Deluxe player. But Im out. Its fun to see FW and GW have their biases but there is absolutely no reason to not play this with Nurgle and basically skip even what Tzeentch has to offer.
  6. Killax

    AoS 2 - Maggotkin of Nurgle Discussion

    Yes. Its your second Allegiance ability lol. A tradeoff lol. There is nothing that doesnt allow you to thake anything you like.
  7. Killax

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    For those who want to competitively play Chaos, go Nurgle, you get a free Allegiance ability on top of your Allegiance ability. https://www.forgeworld.co.uk/resources/fw_site/fw_pdfs/aos_warscrolls/warhammer-aos-tamurkhans-horde.pdf Have fun, gg. I'm skipping this meme edition untill its sorted out. Cheers,
  8. Killax

    AoS 2 - Maggotkin of Nurgle Discussion

    Maggotkin of Nurgle went full AoS3. Congrats with your Maggotkin of Nurgle Tamurkhan's Horde armies. https://www.forgeworld.co.uk/en-GB/Tamurkhans-Horde-2018
  9. Killax

    AoS 2 - Maggotkin of Nurgle Discussion

    Why am I even playing Khorne?
  10. I would be totally fine with it on a 40mm base, though it reaps a slight advantage over a 32mm. In this case though I REALLY liked the set up these forums made to use models with the bases supplied. Which is why I am fine with some Bloodbound heroes on 32 and some on 40. While indeed including older models we have the mix of 32 and 40 allready. What I like much less is that Skarbrand now is supplied with "the wrong base" and so are all non-Riptooth variants of Fleshhounds... Sometimes...
  11. This is very open to debate, I dont really see it as an issue as the Starter kit and the Mighty Lord + Bloodsecrator kit both have him provided with a 32mm base... Not saying it would matter too much but if you catch the banner too much during gaming the 40mm base isn't going to change that. Yep. Minus the yellow edits haha.
  12. Killax

    Age of Sigmar: Second Edition

    Its very possible that this is the case. But whats funny/odd is that if they even went to the website themselves or called with someone from the production lines I'm sure they could have prefented these oddities. GWs website has it listed rather correctly, so what gives that they didnt even check that out first? Seems odd.
  13. Killax

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    @Hystarion and @Xasz I read that awnser as Battalions NOT contributing to additional CP, but am I now understanding the awnser wrong? Really the more I look at this edition the less Im beginning to understand what they intended with all of it. What actually happened after they improved the Core rules?
  14. Killax

    AoS 2 - Blades of Khorne Discussion

    I'm cool with any base as long as it's not some inconsistent approach XD Which it currently is. But hey I guess we went from Skarbrand on a different base to Karnak, Riptooth and the Flesh Hounds on different bases lol.
  15. Also didn't @Ben have a wonderful excel sheet with all the bases as provided anyway? I mean, the easiest way to do this is really to have GW remove the current one for the time being and figure out what the actual plan is or consistent approach is. The whole document raises a lot of questions. To me it's either, do w/e you want or list it correctly, less ideal is this in-between stuff.. I really couldn't care about "advantages", the thing is really that 40K has them used as 50mm Fleshhounds, the latest Fleshhound (Riptooth) is also on a 50mm base. So why Karnak has a different base as Flesh Hounds who have a different base to Riptooth is again a complete mystery to me. It's the first time I think I've actually see the same 'fluff model' be listed as it being based on 3 different base sizes...