Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
Welcome Guest!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?

The Jabber Tzeentch

  • Content count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


The Jabber Tzeentch last won the day on October 3 2016

The Jabber Tzeentch had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

385 Celestant-Prime


About The Jabber Tzeentch

  • Rank
    Dracothian Guard

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Age of Sigmar: Second Edition

    This, if true, will be awesome and open up many more heroes that are currently underused.
  2. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Let's chat Fyreslayers

    That is a very good point indeed.
  3. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Let's chat Fyreslayers

    This part of the rule no longer applies. It’s literally fully replaced by the faq.
  4. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Rolling for first turn

    Probably just a mistake. I very much doubt they plan on changing the core rules without a complete overhaul which at 2.5 years in is a bit early still. But who knows, they have recently stopped putting the core rules in to the battletomes...
  5. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Losing Battalion Drops

    I would prefer that the rule was more unique rather than just as a standard on every battalion. But I very much doubt it will change its part of the core rules and built in the point costs at the moment.
  6. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Balewind Vortex - Bad for the game?

    I think it’s fine as it is now. I would like to see more summoned terrain and more ways to manipulate the board with your army so every faction has access to it.
  7. The Jabber Tzeentch

    I'm lost choosing THE faction

    It’s extremely subjective. Many factions can do what you’re after but really it should boil down to the models you like. Order are likely your best grand alliance Defensive with guns options: Kahadron Overlords Freeguild Dispossessed Ironweld Arsenal Stormcast Eternals (kind of) Skaven Clan Skryre
  8. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Universal Painting and Modelling Efficiency Guide

    Some fantastic tips here guys thank you, very useful lysandestolpe My plan is to extract and consolidate the information in to one easy to use guide, aimed at fairly new painters but useful for all.
  9. I’m looking to build a consolidated repository of guides, tips and techniques for painting and modelling efficiency. Focusing on a good ratio of time vs reward to get a tabletop standard army on the table. Topics I plan to include: • General hobby tips • Army scheme planning methods • Efficient model building techniques • Quick and varied basing • Undercoating efficiently • Speed painting • Finishing touches To speed up the process I am asking for your help, everyone has their own ways and unique methods for getting things done, so post them here! Anything that you think helps you build and paint faster, whether it’s a special tool you found for weathering or some sort of multi model holding vice for undercoating, and actually layering and highlighting techniques I want it all. Thanks in advance for your help, please share far and wide.
  10. They normally have a default reply like that for everything, so don’t be disheartened. It will be picked up, and also various GW reps are on this forum who I’m sure pass on good ideas.
  11. I feel like this is becoming massively over complicated. Realistically the best solution is for the GW app to have the most up to date versions of the warscroll with relevant faq/errata amended on the scroll. It doesn’t break the game for anyone using paper versions, they can still continue to use printed FAQ. And it saves a time and hassle for everyone else. This really is the digital age and there’s no reason for GW to be behind, no matter the company size. Having a Document Contol System in place has little downside and is low relative cost. I mean they must have the underworkings already in place, it’s just not efficiently managed.
  12. Maybe this is something the community could take on? if a GW rep could send editable pdfs of the warscrolls we could make a respository on his site.
  13. I think youre right there about the culture and the main issue is that they just don’t do project management as a whole very well, so the minor detail of document control isn’t even a concept. But as a principle it’s so widely adopted and GW is more than large enough it’s kind of embarrassing that they don’t adopt this stuff.
  14. As someone who works in IT biased project management I can assure you this is a relatively easy task that is commonly done by most businesses. It can be easily seen that GW lack business management techniques in some areas (notably AoS) which I constantly find surprising. Someone at GW needs to employ a PRINCE2 and ITIL specialist.
  15. The Jabber Tzeentch

    Let's Chat: Free Peoples

    Lots of great insight here. I’ll certainly give some of these further thought and play test as soon as possible. I like your idea with duality, solidly defend one and keep the opponent just behind. Will work well against more combat oriented armies I think. Your last point is spot on, it’s a very defensive ability but you can still use it in an aggressive way. I think positioning is really key with this army.