Jump to content

Ratamaplata

Members
  • Posts

    181
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

448 profile views

Ratamaplata's Achievements

Protector

Protector (6/10)

130

Reputation

1

Community Answers

  1. My first completed miniature since quitting the hobby 20 yrs ago at 16.
  2. My first completed miniature since quitting the hobby 20 yrs ago at 16.
  3. Just get 32mm mdf circles and blutac them on for tournies?
  4. Haha oh yeah. Sometimes the obvious is missed!!
  5. So how would you remove models if they were in a line? Any removal would leave a >1" gap.
  6. How about this... something I don't think anyone has said and I think would clear up a lot of rule misunderstanding or conflicts... The rules should define the basic actions first; "move" = move up to etc... "run" = roll a d6 etc... "charge", "shoot" etc... Then define each phase separately using reference to that glossary. I.e. 'Movement phase' allows every unit to move and run once. This should remove any need to say "as if in the X phase". It would also make it obvious as to when you just make a move or can also run. When you include "set up" as well it should clear up special deployment rules/do they count as a move etc questions?
  7. I still think wording of 'to wound' and damage etc should be changed. Just look at the rules questions sub forum... probably over 50% of questions relate to people misunderstanding the order of wound/save/damage/ability saves and/or if saves are allowed vs. abilities which say they cause wounds etc. Definitely should be cleared up and could be done easily without any change to game mechanics.
  8. Wouldn't that drastically reduce the cool tactics available though? Locking units in position to minimise attacks etc. I think the pile in rules are the best part of the game.
  9. - Appoint a 3rd party GM The GM selects both players armies, writes a battle plan and, if they want to, controls random events or other forces (i.e. a marauding monster). - Barter your army selections Both players bring all their forces then barter with each other... "What do you want to take if I have a MLoK and 10 Blood Warriors?" etc - Random Roll off for it. Line your units up and randomise... you might end up hugely outmatched, but trying to win those games is fun right?
  10. No because you roll to hit then wound (not damage) at the moment. Then wounds turn into a total damage pool, then damage gets applied as wounds. The language used makes it unnecessarily complicated when applying rules which give saves against "wounds" / "mortal wounds" etc. Also makes it plainly obvious what abilities you get armour saves against rather than having the word "wound" before and after the armour save step (as it is now). It doesn't change the mechanics in any way. It just makes it much easier to work out the interaction between various warscroll abilities and would make it easier for GW to use consistent wording when writing rules. Easy change to make. Big gain available imo.
  11. Clear up confusion of wound/damage. It should be... 1. roll to hit 2. roll to damage 3. armour save 4. determine no. of wounds 5. additional saves Would make all the various special rules for inflicting or saving wounds/damage, and mortal wounds, tie up much easier.
×
×
  • Create New...