Jump to content
Welcome Guest!

Join us now to get access to all our features. Once registered and logged in, you will be able to create topics, post replies to existing threads, give reputation to your fellow members, get your own private messenger, and so, so much more. It's also quick and totally free, so what are you waiting for?

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content on 02/08/2017 in all areas

  1. 12 points
    2nd warning. I just deleted a load of posts and warned some users. I think a few of you need to have a think about why you play Warhammer.
  2. 11 points
    Hi everyone. This is just a friendly reminder to everyone to try and keep a lid on things a little. Its was said best earlier in this thread. TGA used to better than this friendly discussion is fine but let's keep it that way. If you feel the need to rant and rage please take it elsewhere
  3. 8 points
    *Glances at 6th ed Bretonnian army book sitting on the shelf* Yeah, I'm going to say the mere fact that GW is reviewing and tweaking the points at all should be a cause for celebration, rather than concern. Honestly it looks like they just picked an army broadly considered overcosted and an army broadly considered undercosted to reveal so they could show us they're listening to player feedback, rather than anything nefarious. Seems like a good thing to me! Of course if the GHBII comes out and Thundertusks and Kurnoth Hunters have dropped in points I'll gladly eat my hat
  4. 7 points
    The first model in my AoS28 warband - a Wild Rider from the Black Sloth Hell: a drowned forest centered around a Realmgate to Shyish, the Realm of Death. The Aelves that live there think they are caught in a purgatory from Aelven folklore - a place where speed and grace and vitality are drained away. But the truth is more sinister than that. With the gates of Azyr opening, emissaries have been arriving at the outskirts of the Aelven realm looking for allies. It is not yet clear what side, if any, the Aelves will take. There is also now an AoS28 Facebook group: https://www.facebook.com/groups/AoS28/
  5. 6 points
    Love everything in this thread. Truly awesome stuff guys! I just finished my 1,000 points of Nighthaunt. I'll have better pictures of them next week. Thinking about how to expand them now, but first I think I'm going to finish bringing my Stormcast up to 1,000 points. I have about 600 points of them painted already.
  6. 6 points
    I hope we get a Dwarfy Ahab, it fits their lore of grudges really well, and could coincide with another faction getting a tasty monster.
  7. 6 points
    This is the leader of my Black Sloth Hell Aelves, the Spiritseer. More than the others, she has been warped by the unnatural swamp. All the aelves wear masks, partly out of shame over what has become of them: aelves are a vain and proud race and entropy and decay is anathema to them. I don't usually use 3rd party models but the body I've used - from a D&D miniature - was so perfect for my theme that I couldn't resist.
  8. 6 points
    that's very cool stuff. I will start something with my necromancer's blood magic coven. I hope you will like it
  9. 4 points
    Putrid Blightkings finished and based!
  10. 4 points
    Tell truth really disappointed in this group now. I thought AoS community was friendly then this and all about love of the game. Instead we get told we'er a bunch of beginners and we make crappy lists. Don't care how you spin it thats just rude.
  11. 3 points
    This could easily be titled 'A tale of one (split personality) painter'. I love this hobby and pretty much every army and model. I have painted up a number of warhammer armies over the last few years and hope to continue adding to each grand alliance with this plog. Im also finally starting to play a couple of games at my local store in a path to glory with ironjawz being my first project. However I couldn't help but pick this guy up last Saturday. I havent got any of the new tzeentch stuff yet but may do once I have the ironjawz done.
  12. 3 points
    We all have a responsibility to the larger community.
  13. 3 points
    I don't listen to community podcasts as I'm not much interested in "high level" play at tournaments, because what happens there rarely matches what's happening when I actually play. I will say that one TO rekking with an army hardly constitutes a reason to consider them unbalanced, but on the other hand Tomb Kings were an undercosted crutch to keep Death propped up, and I find myself nodding in agreement with the teased new costs, for the most part. As far as local play, a lot of it is practicing for tournaments. Often it's a game or two in prep, lately it's been lots because we're having a doubles tournament, so players are learning to build complementary lists and work together. Most games are played in anticipation of the next local tournament at the store, and the format changes each time which keeps things fresh. However we often have the odd narrative game to cleanse the palate as it were. It's worth noting that the Fyreslayers group on Facebook apparently got 500 people or so to sign an agreed amendment to points values they all came up with, which apparently looked very similar to the teased points values. TOs may have a fair amount of influence, but apparently the players and communities do as well.
  14. 3 points
    I am absolutely terrified for any potential Dark/Slaaensh Aelf release. The inevitable bandwagon is going to sicken me...as FYI, they are mine! (I'm such a horrible hypocrite though as I'm all too happy to bandwagon elsewhere haha!)
  15. 3 points
    Leader of my chaos warband . All the chosen are going to be slaughter priest size and the scummy underlings normal .
  16. 3 points
    Hi everyone, As @scrubyandwells mentioned, I've spent quite a few hours jamming all of the data that I could find from the lists of this event into a google docs spreadsheet. I hope some of you find it useful! You fan view the spreadsheet here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1wKH4-s7Z2t-dHU_gfQHPGbEvT20_h4pdc9NenaLNX-I/edit?usp=sharing Some info that you might want to help interpret the sheet: There are four pages, one for each Grand Alliance. Within each alliance I broke it down into categories based on theme. I was not completely strict about allegiance here -- for example if you took an all Khorne army plus Sayl, you still get to go in the Khorne category. Armies that were clearly mixed were put in the mixed category for that GA. In the Death GA, I differentiated between mixed lists that included Tomb Kings units and those that did not. A couple of lists used a bunch of TK stuff while one used only a single Necrotect, but I still put that latter list in the Mixed Death w/ TK category. I listed all traits and artefacts mentioned on the army lists. They are listed both as their own entry in the roster and also I've added notes to indicate what traits/artefacts are held by characters (note is listed on the character's entry). I've also used notes to indicate unit equipment loadouts when they were explicitly listed. Battalions got their own entry. In some cases I clarified that an entry is a battalion, trait or artefact if I was concerned there might be a unit with a same or similar name and cause confusion. Unit entries are given the form XxY where X is the number of units of a given size and Y is the number of default choices in the unit size. So "1x1" means a single unit of the minimum size, "2x2" is two units of double minimum size each, and so on. For example, if someone took a unit of 40 skeletons, two units of 20 skeletons and a unit of 10 skeletons it would be listed as: 1x4, 2x2, 1x1. Five players' (Ryan Taylor, Chris Morris, Pamela Castello, Josue Castillo, and Phillip Stinnett) lists were cut off and so part of the list is missing. I marked these with INCOMPLETE or INC next to the player name. There was one player (John Fueuerhelm) that had an incomplete list but the points costs, keywords and battlefield roles were visible so I was able to make some very strong guesses as to what was taken. I went ahead and entered my guesses but put in the possible ambiguities as notes. I also indicated that this list was speculative (SPEC). Six further players (Norman Castillo, Rob Pro, Tony Pacheco, Benjamin Harrison, Mark Cathro, and Martin Orlando) had no lists available through the app If you have any questions about interpreting the data, corrections, or if you'd like to send me some of the information that I'm missing please send me a PM! That way I will get an email notification and can be sure to respond quickly. _________________________________________________________________________________________________________ EDITORIAL SECTION My initial impression in entering these lists is that the metagame for this tournament very much feels like a typical "Friday Night Magic" level of competition to me. There are clearly some players who have brought relatively tuned, established, competitive lists. Some of these lists are optimized (or close to it) while others are not. There are also a lot of players whose lists either reflect homebrew strategies that are clearly designed to be competitive, lists that are clearly focused on theme over competitiveness, and a lot of lists that are "strictly suboptimal" (IE: no artefacts or command traits were listed, free unit upgrades were explicitly not taken). I'm guessing there was also a wide range of skill and experience present, with some competitors being very experienced and others being quite new to the game. Personally, I think that's great. FNM is the pinnacle of fun for a lot of Magic players, particularly at stores that attract a large crowd. It's still competitive enough for people to feel tested but not so cutthroat that you can't bring what you want and still hope to have mostly enjoyable games. I also think we shouldn't necessarily infer what people's motivations are for bringing the lists that they brought. Some players seemed to be focusing on theme, other players may have intentionally been toning it down in terms of "hardness" and still others may have brought lists that were constructed more based on what models they had. Simply stating that players made "bad" choices is unfair as we don't know exactly why the players made the choices that they did. I strongly believe that the results of this tournament shouldn't be taken to indicate what is or isn't overpowered. No single tournament can indicate that, even large ones. The metagame being relatively soft is also a big caveat that reduces the usefulness of the results in terms of balance discussion. I do think we can learn some things about the game from this tournament (hence why I took the time to compile the lists), but we should not over-generalize. Also, please remember that the standings may reflect soft scores as well, so raw placing doesn't necessarily indicate how an army played on the tabletop.
  17. 3 points
    From recording im pretty sure he just straight up said this army is super bent and I'm going to win the Masters with it. He took it and is now the UK Master, made the claim and saw it through lol
  18. 3 points
    This thread was really exciting at first, but after reading all the comments I now have an urge to jab my own eyes out and pretend the last 10 minutes didn't happen. Lets just be excited now and disappointed later, instead of getting all disappointed up front.
  19. 3 points
    5 blood knights is 260 points with 15 wounds, can regenate 3 wounds per turn and wracks face in combat. 3 necropolis knights is too 15 wounds, can generate 5 wounds per turn, wrack face in combat and have way more syngery as they are skeletons. 240 points is fair imo.
  20. 3 points
    Holy Sigmar! This is incredible! I'll get some of my WIPs posted up in this thread tonight. Can't wait to join in on the action! This is one of the most exciting things to happen in AoS so far!
  21. 3 points
    The uniqueness of Death's playstyle or its significance in terms of game balance is lacking. I don't get the heavy feeling of summoning/regeneration/replenishment. Whole units get wiped out and there's no way to just cast a spell that says "resurrect a unit spell cost 6+, if you rolled 10+, res twice that many models, doesn't cost summoning points." FEC is very unappealing to me. Somewhat interesting backstory (IMO) but their playstyle seems to simply be re-skinned orcs/ogres/flankers (ghouls/horrors/cavalry) with an emphasis on model regeneration & healing over raw power. The strategy of "hey get into melee range and roll dice" doesn't exactly describe a lot of options or diversity of gameplay for an ENTIRE faction. Sylvaneth, Tzeentch, Stormcast have way more replayability and diversity among army building & gameplay options. (Maybe Bonesplitterz and Beastclaw are not super diverse, but destruction as a faction seems pretty point-and-click). I think Death would be fine with one new grand alliance book. They can split it into Vampire/Deathrattle/FEC if they want, or stay as 2, but I certainly hope they don't truly consider making a bunch of crappy tiny little factions like (Deathlords, Soulblight, Nighthaunt, Death Walker)...Well not unless they plan on releasing about double the current # of death models. If GW is truly listening: Give one overall Death book. Reduce the number of factions. Define its uniqueness. Identify its strengths and weaknesses. Consider diversity (ranged options, make FEC work with the rest of alliance). Substitute a rules method and design philosophy to make summoning less bad. Advance story..? Provide some story reasons for alternate paint schemes/themes (red/green spirits...purple zombies...blue skeletons etc...)
  22. 3 points
    A. There are a lot of factions that have not gotten anything Death is not a faction, it is an entire grand alliance. If you are sitting around moaning that there is no Battletome: Skyre or Battletome: Free Peoples, well, you are going to have to wait a good long while for that, maybe years (if it happens at all). But I - and most of us here - are not desperate for a single tome. We want deathrattle, we want nighthaunt, we want soulblight, we want deathmages or deadwalkers or a resurgance of Tomb Kings or anything new. Literally throw us one hero in a board game or a clampack. Take mercy and release one little tiny hero, and it will sell out within 20 seconds of it going on sale. At this point how about just a whisper of a rumor of one new death model. B. The fluff leads the models and there has been no death Absolutely false, in every scenario the models lead the fluff. Regardless Nagash has been a big part of the fluff and there has been fluff about an army of skeletal warriors guarding the entrance to Nagash's realm. There has been fluff about a sea of bone resurrected by the necromantic powers of Mannfred to create all manner of skeletal monstrosities. There has been cities of surviving humans in the realm of Shyish, some thralls in service to vampires, others battle-hardened warriors. C. Death is not popular, so they don't want to release models. I just got back from LVO and Death is somewhere between 1/4-1/3 of all players. There was about 4x as many death as any Destruction. D. Death got a lot of love in the End Times so they don't need new stuff Again, death is an entire grand alliance not a faction. That was November 2014 which was quite a while to be ignoring an entire GRAND ALLIANCE. I already have Nagash and multiples of everything else.... E. They are ignoring death because they cannot come up with any unique IPs. Dead Orruks. Dead Duradin. Dead Ogors. Literally everything dies (except stormcast). When something dies, it can be turned undead by Nagash. Skeletal Dracoths, Zombie Maw-Krushas. Take literally and idea and make it a skeleton or a zombie and its now a death model. I cannot think of an easier army to create unique IPs for. Death is the second most important magical army after Tzeentch. The lack of a spell lore is hurting really really bad. Nagash is capped at 4 spells, making his cost at least 250 pts overpriced in matched play. Flesh eaters is a very powerful army when you take the GK on foot from the Death Alliance book as your general, but there is not even a clampack for a ghoul king! There is not a single powerful batallion in the entire grand allaince either. The GA: Death book came with ONE battalion!!! They could seriously release a 4 page errata for FEC to get them up to speed and make them a good army. Unfortunately they wont and, because they got a book too early, it pretty much hurts them more than helps them. Now it could be a decade before FEC get up to speed. And FEC absolutely gutted death, death has nothing left at all to work with. So you got a broken faction and a handful of gutted factions as an entire grand alliance and they are not bothering to fix it. At this point its nothing but wasted potential due to blatant negligence. They need to get their act together and at the very absolute LEAST release a couple of clampacks and a serious rules errata to FEC to give them allegiance stuff and a spell lore so that death has at least one decent faction to work with. Based on the popularity I've seen, they will make bank on any tiny release. They did manage to do one thing - go out of their way to FAQ one of our only artifacts so that its summoning and therefore borderline unusable and also cause a lot of annoyance in tournaments that require to roll for artifacts. Thanks guys, keep up the great work. Absolutely everyone who cares - and there are a lot of us - are in a state of disbelief at how hard Death is getting the short stick in AoS.
  23. 2 points
    Hello TGA Community. . I want to introduce you all to a new project here at The Grand Alliance community. This idea was brought to me by @Bruticus and after some discussion we felt that The Grand Alliance community would be an excellent home for this project. Inq28 meets Age of Sigmar Inq28 explores the lesser known aspects of the Warhammer 40,000 universe and has been a huge success, inspiring Blanchitsu articles, numerous blogs and countless incredible miniatures. Inq28 has become a term that describes not just a particular game but a whole approach to the hobby: an approach that puts creativity and imagination first. AoS28 is an attempt to bring that same approach to the Nine Realms. The Age of Sigmar has the potential for all sorts of stories, and just because we mainly see the epic, cinematic god-battles in the Games Workshop books doesn’t mean there aren’t other stories just out of frame, or just off the beaten path. That’s not to say your warband can’t include a few heroes, just that not every hero has to have a duel with Archaon. What makes a model AoS28? Conversions - The Age of Sigmar range contains loads of great miniatures but you’ll probably want to convert them in order to personalise them. This could be a kitbash or a complete resculpt. The important thing is to make the model yours. Character is essential - you don’t have to write a full background story, but you’ll have to think about your character’s personality, they aren’t just pieces on a gaming board: what are their motivations? How have they survived the Chaos apocalypse? What do they think about the return of Sigmar? What secrets do they have? Extra grimdark - Age of Sigmar has a distinctive, vibrant style, but there is a lot of darkness that is waiting to be explored. You think 40k has a monopoly on grimdark? The Nine Realms were conquered by Chaos, we are only just beginning to learn about the horrors that were unleashed. What rules can I use? We’ll be supporting the Hinterlands rules for AoS28, however your warband could be designed with games of Silver Tower, Mordheim, Realm of Chaos, Frostgrave or countless others in mind - or not for gaming with at all. The focus should be to make models you think are cool, rather than being constrained by points costs or restrictions. How do I join in? You’ll need to make a warband - probably between 2 and 8 models - led by a hero. The warband can be based on the theme below, or can be anything else you want to make. Start a blog on www.tga.community and add the tag ‘aos28’. Use the hashtag #aos28 on instagram and twitter. Or if you have a blog already, let people know where to find it by posting your updates in the AoS28 thread on tga.community or by emailing aos28@exprofundis.com If you don’t want to make a miniature or two, you could join in by writing stories or making art. What comes next? Over the next few months we’ll be showcasing all the best AoS28 models and warbands from any participating blog, as well as our own warbands. We’ll track what everyone is doing with Work in Progress photos and then final photographs in a few months. There is no real deadline, because AoS28 is an ongoing thing. But we will roll out a new theme every few months, along with a wrap up of everything so far. In addition there will be a new edition of Hinterlands dealing with AoS28 specifically, posts about background stories and ideas and possibly even gaming events at Warhammer World. I need some ideas Without many background or art books to draw inspiration from it might seem more difficult to come up with Age of Sigmar concepts than it is with Warhammer 40k. Age of Sigmar is often regarded as high fantasy, and you may feel that things need to fit this style in order to be suitable, but really you have a free reign to do whatever you can imagine: with infinite realms there are very few limits to what is acceptable. Like Warhammer 40k, Age of Sigmar has room for all sorts of stories of all sorts of genres. You are free to make whatever you want to make, but if you are stuck there is a theme you could try: AoS28: Witch Hunters The gates of Azyrheim are open and the Stormcast are unleashed on the Nine Realms. Cities and fortresses, thought lost forever are rediscovered. Lines of communication are rebuilt. And along with the Stormcast there are also other emissaries of Sigmar’s new world order. These Witch Hunters are tasked with rooting out corruption within the so-called Free Cities and the lost tribes, where mortals claim they have managed to resist the apocalypse. They seek the truth of these claims, and hunt the deceivers, betrayers and abominations. Some travel in disguise and infiltrate the Free Cities, rooting out the corruption where it may otherwise go unnoticed. Some arrive at the city gates at the head of a punitive force, demanding tribute in Sigmar’s name. There are stories of tribes that claim to have escaped the taint of Chaos being put to the sword during these witch hunts. And there are stories of Sigmar’s agents themselves falling foul of the taint of Chaos and instead spreading the very corruption they profess to seek out. The Shadowblades of the Seven Severed Fingers Cabal use assassins that travel through the Chaos wastes unnoticed, cloaked in the hides of daemons. They fight the horror of Chaos with horror of their own, and are able to strike fear into the blackest of hearts. The Bitterlight Guild of Azyrheim use blinding, excoriating magic to interrogate those they suspect of corruption, stripping away lies and flesh until only truth remains. Their agents are said to be pure and incorruptable by some, and perverse sadists by others. The childlike Oracle of Shyish can taste the taint of Chaos in the blood of men and women. Under the watchful eye of her immobile, silent Stormcast guardian, thousands of pilgrims bring her offerings in a hope to prove their purity. The Knight-Venator Calliostro, tasked with finding tribes that had resisted the hordes of the Blood God, instead came across a Slaughterpriest who claimed to have been cured of the madness of Khorne when he pierced his own skull. The pair formed an unlikely alliance, but so far have been unable to replicate the accidental trepanation, despite the accuracy of the Venator’s arrows and an unending tide of test subjects. The aquatic Duaradin fortress of Deepthunder has held out against the apocalypse since time immemorial. Under near constant attack, the citizens seal themselves in their hold and flood the city using ingenious mechanical walls and pumps, drowning any invaders. But emmissaries sent to the fortress noticed with some alarm that the barnacles that can be found all across Deepthunder can also be found on the skin of the sallow-eyed, secretive Duaradin that live there. Eager to establish new alliances in the wake of Sigmar’s return, the crippled Vampire diplomat Malapraktor set out in his iron carriage, a ruinous steam-powered contraption. The vampire’s diligence in finding those whose blood is tainted by Chaos is perhaps unsurpassed by any other, but his manner of creating converts to his cause is more forceful than most. The Shaii’ik tribe lived unseen by the scrying eyes of Tzeentch, worshipping a frail, masterless daemon. The entity granted them all invisibility from Chaos so long as they protected it in kind. When ambassadors from Azyrheim encountered the tribe the sight of the withered daemon sickened them, and they burned it. After some deliberation, they burned the tribe too. How to use this thread? This thread is going to become the home for the AoS28 project. Feel free to make use of the various TGA sections such as Painting and Modelling forums to show others what you are painting, or your own thread in the Narrative forums to talk about your warbands back story. You can also start your own blog and post photos in the gallery section but be sure to post links and updates in here to keep a central archive. You can easily find and share this thread and with the url - TGA.community/AoS28
  24. 2 points
    Hi, I am looking to sell on my destruction army. It is converted and painted to a high standard and has won a best army award in the past, but I just haven't picked it up to play with for some time so it seems time to move it on. List of models below with pics (apologies for poor pic quality), if interested make me an offer. Heroes: 1 x Tyrant 1x Butcher 1 x Firebelly Units 12 x Ogors 14 x Ironguts (champion riding Rhinox that could easily be used as a second tyrant) 2 x Sabre Tusk Behemoths 5 x Giants/Aleguzzler Gargants (including one converted to be the king for the sons of bahamut formation) 2 x Giants carrying Ironblasters that could be used as either Giants or Ironblasters Misc 3 x Objective markers Aleguzzlers: The Gargant King! Gargants/Ironblasters Ogors Ironguts Irongut Champion/ Tyrant Sabretusk / Objectives Tyrant Butcher Firebelly
  25. 2 points
    That is weird. Hopefully it means a cheaper plastic kit or something. From what I've seen and heard, most people convert up cheaper kits (usually High Elf Dragon Princes) to play as Blood Knights, because they're so damn expensive. They're a popular unit - the Warscroll isn't going to go away. Likely scenario is new models. Even then, conversions are easy and commonly understood.
  26. 2 points
    When I think about all new GW releases one song comes to my mind. Queen's 'I want it all'!
  27. 2 points
    @RichardCZ Throwing a grudge your way. Going to make up for all those times you smashed me in 8th!
  28. 2 points
    Whilst my topic is in part inspired by the reaction to the recent experimental points reveal, I'm genuinely hoping to have a broader discussion about the influence of TO's in general. That said, it's inevitable that some specific examples of community debate will arise. I think this supports the idea that TO's, and particularly the TO's for SCGT, do have a great deal of influence over the game beyond the effect their decisions may have at this one tournament. Tournament organisers are now actively involved in determining points values, game mechanics, battleplan rules and so forth at the most 'official' level. And the feedback you mention is presumably largely drawn from other members of the tournament fraternity. So if we assume that the basic premise of tournaments influencing the wider community is correct, then this is an example of TO's and tournament players using their influence in ways that will ultimately impact the casual player. We can debate whether that's a good or bad thing of course. This is interesting. So what you're saying is that Tomb Kings were in fact, in many instances, not performing particularly well. One tournament organiser who is not representative of the general skill level within the community attended one tournament with Tomb Kings, won, and on this basis has used his influence to encourage significant changes to the army's points values. That seems like a very flimsy and distorted justification. Whether or not this is true I can't say, but this is how you've presented it. If this is the case, surely this is a prime example of a TO using a disproportionate level of influence in a way that will disproportionately affect the average player? If true, wouldn't this suggest an abuse of influence rather than a recognition of responsibility?
  29. 2 points
    Nope, sorry. The FAQ from desember 2016 states that all keywords in battalion requirements are printed in bold. See for example Horror Hero in the same battalion. Since the Lord of Change is not printed in bold, it refers to the unit name, not the keyword.
  30. 2 points
    I guess I'll have to paint my Grail Knights then
  31. 2 points
    Older beastman pig-giant i build out of wire, milliput & some bitz.
  32. 2 points
  33. 2 points
    Hi all, I've seen a fair amount of grumblings on here recently and in an effort to keep this a positive place to hang out I want to encourage everyone to use the report button. It's there for a reason and you can also leave a comment for the moderators. The peoprson you report will never know who has reported them, or that they have been reported unless the moderators have to issue a warning. No one will get banned over a report saying 'this could be nicer' but if we get repeated reports about the same people then things can be done. I want these boards to be a fun and inviting place to chat about Age of Sigmar and if a new person sees big news online like New AoS Points update, heads here to check it out or join the discussion and sees arguing, complaining and general bile it is not very inviting. If you have any ideas how to help keep this place fun post them in here. Thanks, Ben
  34. 2 points
    It worries me slightly that the Mourngul makes so many undercosted lists on here. He's good no doubt about it but the prolific use is more to with how anaemic death is as a whole rather than his points being incorrect. As for the changes to TK I'd say the snakes could have gone higher (my suggestion was 260) in line with the blood knights who (fingers crossed) will now drop in line with the snakes. Sad about Kemmler though. He's made pretty much every list I've written for the last 18 months.
  35. 2 points
  36. 2 points
    I also respect your opinion, but disagree that GW has no interest. I think GW has an interest in all players who have invested in a faction feeling like they can field a list that is at least borderline competitive with that faction. It keeps older players in the hobby and also gives confidence to newer players that their investment of money and time (assembling and painting) isn't going to get relegated to second-class status whenever it suits GW financially. If I was a new player and found out that some armies had been dropped and now GW was nerfing them because they no longer sell the models, I'd be pretty concerned about that happening to my army of choice and I'd also feel pretty wary of GW as a company. GW already has a reputation of pushing sales of new stuff by making it OP and it absolutely turns people off that otherwise might be interested. As far as retaining old players goes -- while the big bucks is definitely in attracting new players, retaining old players is still great for business. How many veterans do you know that are still very active in the hobby and yet don't make ongoing new purchases? It's also extremely valuable to new players to have veterans around as mentors, particularly for the artistic side of the hobby. Learning to assemble and paint is really intimidating to a lot of potential new players. I absolutely agree that GW should be actively seeking to avoid having any compendium or forgeworld stuff be dominant in the metagame, as finding out that the most competitive stuff is either really hard to get or outright unavailable from GW would be a big turnoff for new players. Letting the old stuff remain at least reasonably competitive though is in everyone's best interest.
  37. 2 points
    Best General awards slowly turned the competitive scene into an all or nothing mentality. We lost best sport, theme, paint, overall in favor if best battle or 1st place in a W/L event that is even more skewed. There has been a huge push by the community in the US and in other parts of the world for more hobby centric events. #BringingHobbyBack
  38. 2 points
    What a great idea for a project and what an inspiring thread! I've been having great fun digging around in my bits box. Here is a very WIP picture of Prince Yvraine of Hammerhal, an aelf who has had just about enough of the depravity of the Realms, so rides out into the wild to right some wrongs. Alongside him are his bodyguard Visella, a master archer and pathfinder, as well as his lifelong pet Sissiqui, a gifted magic user and a terrible nuisance.
  39. 2 points
    Make no mistake... GW already operates off that model. Just a longer gap between resets. I could demonstrate the same with some models, too - but I'm far too lazy to dig some obsolete ones out of my bins.
  40. 2 points
    Last night I managed to finish up my Banshee and my Mourngul. With these two done my 1,000 point army is done! This was my original goal, but I will probably continue to expand these guys out to 2,000 points. I think I will go on to a different small army for the moment though. I will have better pictures of everything by next week most likely. Thanks!
  41. 2 points
    These conspiracy theories fall flat the moment you take a look at GWs history of inconsistent points costing. There is no rhyme or reason to it. If they pointed units for economic reasons, Kairic Acolytes (a brand new kit) wouldn't suck for their points. Fyreslayers wouldn't have been overcosted to begin with. Half the new units they release for 40k suck and aren't worth including in your army unless you're a casual player. And now you are flailing at windmills based on what? A one-page beta preview. That is based on community feedback. And is getting playtested at one of the biggest tournaments in the world. But no, FIGHT THE POWER! Or calm down and wait until you actually get to see these changes in context.
  42. 2 points
    In six hours I am sure no one has managed to play enough games in a competitive setting to know whether or not these changes are at the correct level or not. I'd also point out that even GW has stated they are experimental and being tested at the SCGT (quite sensibly given the number of people attending). So yet again lots of running around and waving of hands in the air over Speculation.
  43. 2 points
    LOL do you really think all 200 players going to the SCGT really think they're in it to win it? Maaaaybe 50 of them are really thinking it, maybe another 50 are thinking "if I just get the right matchups...", the other 100 are thinking "let's have a wicked time hanging out and smashing our little men together". The chumps at the bottom having a good time are funding the champs at the top (having a different sort of good time, neither better nor worse), and giving them their bragging rights - the winner gets to claim winning a larger event than he would if the chumps stayed home.
  44. 2 points
    My eyes just rolled out of my head. Because this is a sample? There's a 100+ page book being put together for updates. You're doing it now. You would do it then. You'll do it forever. You'll argue both sides of the coin, because it is the only rationalization that you can conjure. Any point decrease is to promote sales. Any point increase is to promote sales of something else. It is pointless circular logic and makes any attempt at balancing a system hilariously fruitless. This logic is unequivocally a cancer on the community.
  45. 2 points
    Ok so Elephant in the room I'm a really slow painter. Got these two done. Working on the musician right now. Sorry I couldn't take a picture of the back of the guy with shield glue is still drying on the base.
  46. 2 points
    No, the shadow of GW is/was a thing, and a very real possibility, even with all the nice things they've done lately. It doesn't erase 15 years of being evil because they have like 2 years of not. However, back on topic. I wonder if they are adjusting ALL the points, or only some things. I mean, could we see reductions/increases across the board?
  47. 2 points
    Yeh Austin is a great guy, I'm a big fan of his. Was a shame not to catch up with him on my recent visit to the US. Paint nomination, Best Sports and 2nd overall. Hobby hero!!
  48. 2 points
    Where are people seeing TK are no longer Compendium? They have just grouped together some rules on a page titled experimental and bunched them together under 2 alliances making it an easier read and less titles. Until the GHB2 is released we won't know whether Compendium is gone, renamed, etc
  49. 2 points
    I'm really looking forwards to getting stuck into a project in AoS28. I plan to run the Blood and Glory skirmish event under these rules too. My Stormcast are a good fit and I have a converted Knight-Questor ready to paint as my Warband leader.
  50. 2 points
    I've been working on this guy for a while. I had an hour in him this afternoon to finish the weapon options and pose. He still needs a bit of free stuff and maybe a few more trinkets stuck in but he's done enough to show off.
This leaderboard is set to London/GMT+01:00
×