TerrorPenguin Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 OH MY GOD PLEASE NO Everytime someone even mentions 'illegal batallions' we have this same argument which goes round and round and round and round. People quote everything everyone has said, pull each minute word choice detail to pieces in an attempt to prove they are right. Seriously, this happens once a month and has been argued to death. Its ok to disagree. Not everyone will agree with you all the time. You don't have to have the last word. It's the internet, arguing about toy soldiers on the internet is a lose lose situation. please stop, I beg you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deynon Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 23 hours ago, wayniac said: I'm sorry but if I was a TO and someone tried to argue that their opponent should be disqualified for using a battalion that allows Prosecutors because it doesn't say "Prosecutors with X" and argue that keyword vs. unit name stuff, I'd laugh at them for taking things too seriously. I think even if GW said that wasn't the case, you would argue until blue in the fact that it's "not official until there is an FAQ" on it. Personally I think it's taking things way too seriously, although if I recall from our last debate on this, you don't actually think that your opponent shouldn't be allowed to use it, just that by the letter of the rules they can't so it has to be house-ruled to be allowed. IThe priblem is the pretence to laugh at it and prevent at the same time the Carrion put. If you do, beh, you're applying rules those are partial, so, you laugh, but I take away my group from your tournaments. You call keyword against unit name stuff? They are GW FAQs, if you change them ou have to note them. Otherway I can brin the royal managerie woth GK riding the beasts... it's the same... but, it would not be admitted... You can laugh, but you would only show how inadequate is your TO management. It's a TO, it's serious. There are prizes, sometime money, and so in; so there has to be foresight to such accidents. If you don't notify clearly in the infopack about the rules modified, you can't change on the whim. It's not about soldiers miniatures or so on, it's what a TO realy should offer: precision. Guess what would happen in a soccer\rugby match if the arbiter would changethe rules without tell about it beforehand, or if the players would leave the TO haòfway cause it. The TO is away to meet and to play together, byt if nowhere rules changed happen to prevent me to bring something and at the same time the same thing prevent me allow the other one to do based on the same principke... why should I pay to cone to your TO? If unfair treatment why to go to a TO in first pkace, better some casual game so... GW did something similar in the past and it too had a storm of recrimination about such thins. Rules applied different on dfferent tables in the same tournament. The rules are such you apply the rules to anyone in the exact same way. Do you change them? Write them down clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZealousJ Posted May 26, 2017 Author Share Posted May 26, 2017 What have I done? WHAT HAVE I DONE! You maniacs! You blew it up! Ah damn you! Damn you all to hell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
deynon Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 9 hours ago, ZealousJ said: What have I done? WHAT HAVE I DONE! You maniacs! You blew it up! Ah damn you! Damn you all to hell! We are the Death armies... we are the hell! ahahahah^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.